FSTFX vs. SUB
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (FSTFX) and iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB).
FSTFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 24, 1986. SUB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE Short Maturity AMT-Free US National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Nov 5, 2008.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSTFX or SUB.
Performance
FSTFX vs. SUB - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTFX achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly higher than SUB's 1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTFX has outperformed SUB with an annualized return of 1.32%, while SUB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.15% annualized return.
FSTFX
2.53%
-0.11%
2.51%
4.61%
1.06%
1.32%
SUB
1.98%
-0.06%
2.23%
3.37%
1.13%
1.15%
Key characteristics
FSTFX | SUB | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 2.63 | 2.40 |
Sortino Ratio | 4.29 | 3.78 |
Omega Ratio | 1.71 | 1.50 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.36 | 3.56 |
Martin Ratio | 11.08 | 11.36 |
Ulcer Index | 0.40% | 0.31% |
Daily Std Dev | 1.67% | 1.49% |
Max Drawdown | -7.38% | -9.46% |
Current Drawdown | -0.49% | -0.37% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSTFX vs. SUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTFX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SUB's 0.07% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FSTFX and SUB is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSTFX vs. SUB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (FSTFX) and iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FSTFX vs. SUB - Dividend Comparison
FSTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than SUB's 2.04% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund | 1.97% | 1.69% | 1.38% | 1.26% | 1.59% | 1.75% | 1.64% | 1.50% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.91% | 1.82% |
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF | 2.04% | 1.73% | 0.86% | 0.72% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.32% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 0.76% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
FSTFX vs. SUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTFX drawdown since its inception was -7.38%, smaller than the maximum SUB drawdown of -9.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTFX and SUB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FSTFX vs. SUB - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (FSTFX) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) at 0.65%. This indicates that FSTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.