PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTEX vs. TMLPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTEX vs. TMLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Energy Fund (FSTEX) and Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSTEX having a 21.72% return and TMLPX slightly lower at 21.52%. Over the past 10 years, FSTEX has underperformed TMLPX with an annualized return of 6.17%, while TMLPX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.45% annualized return.


FSTEX

1D
0.21%
1M
-9.24%
YTD
21.72%
6M
22.82%
1Y
30.68%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
19.25%
10Y*
6.17%

TMLPX

1D
0.38%
1M
-4.63%
YTD
21.52%
6M
21.94%
1Y
23.44%
3Y*
23.95%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTEX vs. TMLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTEX
Invesco Energy Fund
21.72%12.31%6.00%0.28%52.85%55.99%-32.13%4.78%-26.82%-8.26%
TMLPX
Transamerica Energy Infrastructure
21.52%3.87%38.51%5.07%9.12%23.54%-11.25%15.66%-15.29%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTEX and TMLPX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.77

The correlation between FSTEX and TMLPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTEX vs. TMLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTEX
FSTEX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FSTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

TMLPX
TMLPX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TMLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
TMLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTEX vs. TMLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Energy Fund (FSTEX) and Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSTEXTMLPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

3.48

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.60

9.01

-1.41

FSTEX vs. TMLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the TMLPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTEX and TMLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSTEX vs. TMLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTEX drawdown since its inception was -83.31%, which is greater than TMLPX's maximum drawdown of -67.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTEX and TMLPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTEXTMLPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.31%

-67.18%

-16.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.09%

-7.12%

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.58%

-16.60%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.88%

-16.60%

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.41%

-55.61%

-17.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.82%

-5.23%

-7.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.17%

-22.50%

-2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

2.75%

+1.15%

Volatility

FSTEX vs. TMLPX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Energy Fund (FSTEX) has a higher volatility of 7.06% compared to Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX) at 5.23%. This indicates that FSTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTEXTMLPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.06%

5.23%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.96%

10.75%

+5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

14.03%

+5.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.14%

17.20%

+7.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.66%

21.78%

+7.88%

FSTEX vs. TMLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTEX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than TMLPX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTEX vs. TMLPX - Dividend Comparison

FSTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than TMLPX's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTEX
Invesco Energy Fund
1.82%2.22%4.03%2.11%0.89%1.80%2.21%1.53%3.05%2.22%1.10%1.58%
TMLPX
Transamerica Energy Infrastructure
2.83%4.33%3.71%7.34%4.83%4.33%6.09%5.65%6.10%5.51%3.95%5.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTEX and TMLPX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTEX has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to TMLPX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTEX dropped -83.31% vs TMLPX's -67.18%.

TMLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTEX and TMLPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer