PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTBX vs. IPIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTBX vs. IPIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Global Allocation Fund (FSTBX) and Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio (IPIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FSTBX

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.91%
YTD
7.83%
6M
7.69%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
5.69%
10Y*
7.55%

IPIRX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTBX vs. IPIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTBX
Federated Hermes Global Allocation Fund
7.83%16.61%9.08%11.22%-15.42%8.54%12.56%17.87%-8.60%17.06%
IPIRX
Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio
6.84%14.21%7.31%10.65%-17.52%6.06%16.10%18.35%-9.87%15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTBX and IPIRX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between FSTBX and IPIRX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTBX vs. IPIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTBX
FSTBX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FSTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

IPIRX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTBX vs. IPIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Global Allocation Fund (FSTBX) and Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio (IPIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSTBXIPIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.84

FSTBX vs. IPIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSTBX vs. IPIRX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTBXIPIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

Volatility

FSTBX vs. IPIRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTBXIPIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.04%

FSTBX vs. IPIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTBX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than IPIRX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTBX vs. IPIRX - Dividend Comparison

FSTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, less than IPIRX's 44.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTBX
Federated Hermes Global Allocation Fund
5.86%6.35%2.01%1.53%1.72%15.46%2.28%2.55%5.79%1.43%1.87%1.14%
IPIRX
Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio
44.20%5.64%3.25%14.65%13.55%6.34%6.25%7.80%1.30%2.78%2.78%7.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTBX and IPIRX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTBX and IPIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer