PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FST.TO vs. ETP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FST.TO vs. ETP.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

FST.TO (First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF) and ETP.TO (First Trust Global Risk Managed Income Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FST.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while ETP.TO is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the Nasdaq Global Risk Managed Income Index. FST.TO is actively managed, while ETP.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FST.TO returned 16.91%/yr vs 3.80%/yr for ETP.TO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FST.TO vs. ETP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF (FST.TO) and First Trust Global Risk Managed Income Index ETF (ETP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FST.TO achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than ETP.TO's 5.10% return.

FST.TO

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.03%
6M
5.45%
YTD
9.32%
1Y
26.44%
3Y*
23.27%
5Y*
16.91%
10Y*
—

ETP.TO

1D
0.05%
1M
0.74%
6M
4.76%
YTD
5.10%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*
3.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FST.TO vs. ETP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FST.TO
First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF		9.32%29.77%26.23%12.01%2.26%19.40%2.56%16.10%-8.27%14.81%
ETP.TO
First Trust Global Risk Managed Income Index ETF		5.10%9.03%11.18%5.68%-10.84%6.08%-0.95%11.41%-4.09%5.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FST.TO and ETP.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2016

0.23

The correlation between FST.TO and ETP.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF

First Trust Global Risk Managed Income Index ETF

Often compared with FST.TO:
FST.TO vs. BLCK.TOFST.TO vs. CLSA.TOFST.TO vs. HXH.TOFST.TO vs. DMEC.TOFST.TO vs. TLV.TOFST.TO vs. ZDV.TOFST.TO vs. CDZ.TO

Return for Risk

FST.TO vs. ETP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FST.TO
FST.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FST.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FST.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FST.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FST.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FST.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
ETP.TO
ETP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ETP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ETP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FST.TO vs. ETP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF (FST.TO) and First Trust Global Risk Managed Income Index ETF (ETP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FST.TOETP.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.08
2.90

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.97
4.28

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.58

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

3.90

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.77

16.53

-0.77

FST.TO vs. ETP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FST.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the ETP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FST.TO and ETP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FST.TO vs. ETP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FST.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.15%, which is greater than ETP.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FST.TO and ETP.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FST.TOETP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.15%

-26.38%

-11.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-2.81%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.33%

-5.73%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.73%

-15.30%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-26.38%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

0.00%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-3.26%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

0.66%

+1.02%

Volatility

FST.TO vs. ETP.TO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF (FST.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to First Trust Global Risk Managed Income Index ETF (ETP.TO) at 0.70%. This indicates that FST.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FST.TOETP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

0.70%

+1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

2.90%

+7.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

3.78%

+9.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

5.86%

+8.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

7.13%

+8.15%

Dividends

FST.TO vs. ETP.TO - Dividend Comparison

FST.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than ETP.TO's 3.62% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETP.TO
First Trust Global Risk Managed Income Index ETF		3.62%4.03%3.73%4.15%3.25%2.93%3.78%3.76%4.33%4.08%3.84%4.28%
FST.TO
First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF		0.92%1.01%1.16%1.63%2.03%1.87%1.85%1.91%1.12%0.67%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FST.TO and ETP.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FST.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while ETP.TO is Global Equity Income.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FST.TO and ETP.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer