FST.TO vs. BLCK.TO
FST.TO (First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF) and BLCK.TO (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FST.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while BLCK.TO is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Blockchain Index. FST.TO is actively managed, while BLCK.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FST.TO returned 16.99%/yr vs 14.83%/yr for BLCK.TO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FST.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for BLCK.TO.
Performance
FST.TO vs. BLCK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FST.TO achieves a 9.83% return, which is significantly lower than BLCK.TO's 13.83% return.
FST.TO
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 9.83%
- 6M
- 10.32%
- 1Y
- 31.56%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.99%
- 10Y*
- —
BLCK.TO
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 10.56%
- YTD
- 13.83%
- 6M
- 16.17%
- 1Y
- 33.37%
- 3Y*
- 25.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.83%
- 10Y*
- —
FST.TO vs. BLCK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FST.TO First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF | 9.83% | 29.77% | 26.23% | 12.01% | 2.26% | 19.40% | 2.56% | 16.10% | -4.73% |
BLCK.TO First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF | 13.83% | 24.94% | 25.85% | 18.34% | -14.89% | 18.96% | 13.50% | 26.93% | -7.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FST.TO and BLCK.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.20 |
The correlation between FST.TO and BLCK.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FST.TO vs. BLCK.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FST.TO
BLCK.TO
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FST.TO
BLCK.TO
Industrials
FST.TO
BLCK.TO
Consumer Cyclical
FST.TO
BLCK.TO
Energy
FST.TO
BLCK.TO
Basic Materials
FST.TO
BLCK.TO
Technology
FST.TO
BLCK.TO
Consumer Defensive
FST.TO
BLCK.TO
Communication Services
FST.TO
-
BLCK.TO
Healthcare
FST.TO
-
BLCK.TO
Real Estate
FST.TO
-
BLCK.TO
-
Utilities
FST.TO
-
BLCK.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FST.TO vs. BLCK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FST.TO
BLCK.TO
FST.TO vs. BLCK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF (FST.TO) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF (BLCK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FST.TO | BLCK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.47 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 3.59 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.71 | 13.29 | +7.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FST.TO | BLCK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 2.55 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 1.07 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.86 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
FST.TO vs. BLCK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FST.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.15%, which is greater than BLCK.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FST.TO and BLCK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FST.TO | BLCK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.15% | -26.29% | -11.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -9.39% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | -14.88% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.73% | -24.67% | +9.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -5.06% | +1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 2.53% | -1.00% |
Volatility
FST.TO vs. BLCK.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF (FST.TO) is 2.73%, while First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF (BLCK.TO) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that FST.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FST.TO | BLCK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 4.49% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.79% | 11.18% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.41% | 13.21% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 13.91% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 15.91% | -0.59% |
FST.TO vs. BLCK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FST.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCK.TO's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
FST.TO vs. BLCK.TO - Dividend Comparison
FST.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than BLCK.TO's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCK.TO First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF | 1.19% | 1.44% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 3.16% | 1.26% | 0.25% | 2.43% | 0.87% | 0.00% |
FST.TO First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF | 0.92% | 1.01% | 1.16% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 1.85% | 1.91% | 1.37% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FST.TO and BLCK.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FST.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FST.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BLCK.TO.
FST.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while BLCK.TO is Blockchain. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FST.TO and 0.81% for BLCK.TO.
Find the right allocation for FST.TO and BLCK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer