PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSSNX vs. TISBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSSNX vs. TISBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSSNX having a 18.72% return and TISBX slightly lower at 18.69%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSSNX having a 11.22% annualized return and TISBX not far behind at 11.09%.


FSSNX

1D
0.91%
1M
4.97%
YTD
18.72%
6M
17.45%
1Y
41.33%
3Y*
18.75%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
11.22%

TISBX

1D
0.92%
1M
5.00%
YTD
18.69%
6M
17.39%
1Y
41.07%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSSNX vs. TISBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSSNX
Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund
18.72%12.94%11.71%17.11%-20.28%14.70%19.99%25.70%-11.24%14.54%
TISBX
TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund
18.69%12.72%11.60%17.07%-20.31%14.85%20.14%25.61%-10.99%13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FSSNX and TISBX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011

1.00

The correlation between FSSNX and TISBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSSNX vs. TISBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSSNX
FSSNX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FSSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FSSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

TISBX
TISBX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TISBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TISBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TISBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TISBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
TISBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSSNX vs. TISBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSSNXTISBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.29

2.28

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.14

3.12

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

3.99

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.13

14.14

0.00

FSSNX vs. TISBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSSNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the TISBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSSNX and TISBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSSNXTISBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.28

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.30

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.48

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.39

+0.15

Drawdowns

FSSNX vs. TISBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSSNX drawdown since its inception was -41.72%, smaller than the maximum TISBX drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSSNX and TISBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSSNXTISBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.72%

-56.50%

+14.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-10.95%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.45%

-27.44%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.87%

-31.89%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.72%

-41.69%

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.13%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-9.69%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.08%

+0.01%

Volatility

FSSNX vs. TISBX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) have volatilities of 5.59% and 5.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSSNXTISBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

5.59%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.59%

13.58%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.13%

19.16%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.58%

22.55%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.45%

23.44%

+0.01%

FSSNX vs. TISBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSSNX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than TISBX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSSNX vs. TISBX - Dividend Comparison

FSSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than TISBX's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSSNX
Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund
0.91%1.08%1.04%1.43%1.26%3.92%0.94%2.96%4.94%3.37%2.27%2.66%
TISBX
TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund
3.47%4.12%6.82%3.09%1.97%8.96%2.65%5.16%9.29%4.49%4.03%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FSSNX and TISBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TISBX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to FSSNX (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSSNX dropped -41.72% vs TISBX's -56.50%.

FSSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSSNX and TISBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer