FSSMX vs. SMDIX
FSSMX (Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund) and SMDIX (Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FSSMX returned 11.53%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for SMDIX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSSMX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SMDIX.
Performance
FSSMX vs. SMDIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSSMX achieves a 20.52% return, which is significantly higher than SMDIX's 17.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FSSMX has outperformed SMDIX with an annualized return of 11.53%, while SMDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.77% annualized return.
FSSMX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 13.27%
- YTD
- 20.52%
- 1Y
- 18.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
SMDIX
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- YTD
- 17.40%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
FSSMX vs. SMDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSSMX Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund | 20.52% | 2.35% | 12.50% | 17.16% | -13.90% | 23.25% | 13.03% | 29.57% | -7.70% | 19.54% |
SMDIX Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund | 17.40% | 7.45% | 15.41% | 12.69% | -12.44% | 26.06% | 9.17% | 28.05% | -11.03% | 15.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSSMX and SMDIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2012 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FSSMX and SMDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSSMX vs. SMDIX — Risk / Return Rank
FSSMX
SMDIX
FSSMX vs. SMDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX) and Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund (SMDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSSMX | SMDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.36 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 3.80 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.19 | 14.72 | -8.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSSMX vs. SMDIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSSMX drawdown since its inception was -43.37%, smaller than the maximum SMDIX drawdown of -48.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSSMX and SMDIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSSMX | SMDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.37% | -48.26% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.78% | -7.40% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.82% | -20.25% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.00% | -20.87% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.37% | -40.70% | -2.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -0.89% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -6.43% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 1.91% | +1.16% |
Volatility
FSSMX vs. SMDIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund (SMDIX) at 2.80%. This indicates that FSSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSSMX | SMDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 2.80% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.81% | 9.71% | +3.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.53% | 13.67% | +4.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 16.22% | +4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 17.88% | +3.22% |
FSSMX vs. SMDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSSMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SMDIX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSSMX vs. SMDIX - Dividend Comparison
FSSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSSMX Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.10% | 0.78% | 9.73% | 12.87% | 2.31% | 4.03% | 21.01% | 4.12% | 0.92% | 1.84% |
SMDIX Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund | 8.40% | 9.86% | 8.53% | 1.69% | 3.28% | 15.04% | 0.32% | 0.91% | 2.45% | 1.51% | 1.72% | 11.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FSSMX and SMDIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FSSMX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to SMDIX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSSMX dropped -43.37% vs SMDIX's -48.26%.
SMDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSSMX and SMDIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer