PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FSSMX vs. XMHQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FSSMX and XMHQ is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

FSSMX vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.20%
-5.13%
FSSMX
XMHQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FSSMX:

0.54

XMHQ:

0.19

Sortino Ratio

FSSMX:

0.85

XMHQ:

0.40

Omega Ratio

FSSMX:

1.10

XMHQ:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

FSSMX:

0.47

XMHQ:

0.30

Martin Ratio

FSSMX:

2.07

XMHQ:

0.66

Ulcer Index

FSSMX:

4.19%

XMHQ:

5.39%

Daily Std Dev

FSSMX:

16.09%

XMHQ:

18.26%

Max Drawdown

FSSMX:

-50.54%

XMHQ:

-58.19%

Current Drawdown

FSSMX:

-10.13%

XMHQ:

-11.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSSMX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly higher than XMHQ's -2.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FSSMX has underperformed XMHQ with an annualized return of 3.42%, while XMHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.


FSSMX

YTD

0.98%

1M

-4.47%

6M

0.20%

1Y

7.80%

5Y*

4.38%

10Y*

3.42%

XMHQ

YTD

-2.21%

1M

-7.31%

6M

-5.13%

1Y

0.38%

5Y*

14.27%

10Y*

10.80%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSSMX vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSSMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio.


FSSMX
Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund
Expense ratio chart for FSSMX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%
Expense ratio chart for XMHQ: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSSMX vs. XMHQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSSMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSSMX is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSSMX is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSSMX is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSSMX is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSSMX is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSSMX is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

XMHQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XMHQ is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSSMX vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSSMX, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.540.19
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSSMX, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.850.40
The chart of Omega ratio for FSSMX, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.101.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSSMX, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.470.30
The chart of Martin ratio for FSSMX, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.002.070.66
FSSMX
XMHQ

The current FSSMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the XMHQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSSMX and XMHQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.54
0.19
FSSMX
XMHQ

Dividends

FSSMX vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison

FSSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than XMHQ's 5.32% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSSMX
Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund
0.56%0.57%0.78%0.77%0.72%1.02%0.65%1.06%0.49%0.73%0.58%0.30%
XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
5.32%5.20%0.73%1.72%1.00%1.12%1.22%1.59%1.06%1.64%1.34%1.25%

Drawdowns

FSSMX vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSSMX drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSSMX and XMHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-10.13%
-11.77%
FSSMX
XMHQ

Volatility

FSSMX vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX) is 4.43%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that FSSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.43%
4.98%
FSSMX
XMHQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab