FSRPX vs. FSAVX
FSRPX (Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio) and FSAVX (Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSRPX returned 12.16%/yr vs 10.47%/yr for FSAVX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSRPX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FSAVX.
Performance
FSRPX vs. FSAVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSRPX achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly higher than FSAVX's -5.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRPX has outperformed FSAVX with an annualized return of 12.16%, while FSAVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.47% annualized return.
FSRPX
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- 6M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 4.45%
- 1Y
- -2.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
FSAVX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -9.25%
- YTD
- -5.69%
- 1Y
- -3.59%
- 3Y*
- 2.04%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
FSRPX vs. FSAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | 4.45% | -4.15% | 23.28% | 26.94% | -29.44% | 18.25% | 44.27% | 26.33% | 4.58% | 25.55% |
FSAVX Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio | -5.69% | 8.01% | 6.15% | 32.55% | -37.45% | 28.99% | 63.22% | 28.87% | -13.78% | 24.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSRPX and FSAVX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1986 | 0.69 |
The correlation between FSRPX and FSAVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSRPX vs. FSAVX — Risk / Return Rank
FSRPX
FSAVX
FSRPX vs. FSAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSRPX | FSAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | -0.16 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | -0.33 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSRPX vs. FSAVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRPX drawdown since its inception was -55.75%, smaller than the maximum FSAVX drawdown of -81.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRPX and FSAVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSRPX | FSAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.75% | -81.27% | +25.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.79% | -19.11% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -19.11% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.01% | -41.86% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.01% | -43.28% | +4.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.27% | -14.88% | +5.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.09% | -13.37% | +4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.28% | 9.15% | -0.87% |
Volatility
FSRPX vs. FSAVX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) have volatilities of 5.30% and 5.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSRPX | FSAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 5.21% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 15.05% | -3.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.68% | 20.67% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 23.83% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 23.88% | -2.25% |
FSRPX vs. FSAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than FSAVX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSRPX vs. FSAVX - Dividend Comparison
FSRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than FSAVX's 6.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAVX Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio | 6.01% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 0.86% | 2.61% | 2.58% | 8.57% | 4.08% | 7.97% | 15.51% | 7.13% | 16.06% |
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | 6.56% | 8.75% | 12.41% | 7.40% | 2.90% | 15.92% | 6.82% | 2.13% | 2.17% | 3.37% | 0.14% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSRPX and FSAVX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSRPX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to FSAVX (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRPX dropped -55.75% vs FSAVX's -81.27%.
FSRPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSRPX and FSAVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer