PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRNX vs. PSYPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRNX vs. PSYPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) and Palmer Square Income Plus Fund (PSYPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRNX achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly higher than PSYPX's 0.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSRNX having a 3.98% annualized return and PSYPX not far behind at 3.87%.


FSRNX

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
7.68%
6M
6.60%
1Y
9.92%
3Y*
9.07%
5Y*
2.15%
10Y*
3.98%

PSYPX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.86%
1Y
3.57%
3Y*
4.84%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
3.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRNX vs. PSYPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRNX
Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund
7.68%3.03%4.99%11.93%-26.14%40.66%-11.31%23.78%-4.91%3.15%
PSYPX
Palmer Square Income Plus Fund
0.59%3.88%5.40%7.40%-0.77%1.17%3.65%5.29%1.17%4.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRNX and PSYPX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2014

0.16

The correlation between FSRNX and PSYPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.27 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRNX vs. PSYPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRNX
FSRNX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FSRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

PSYPX
PSYPX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PSYPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSYPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSYPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PSYPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSYPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRNX vs. PSYPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) and Palmer Square Income Plus Fund (PSYPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSRNXPSYPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

2.60

-1.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

2.94

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.63

13.47

-9.84

FSRNX vs. PSYPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the PSYPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRNX and PSYPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSRNXPSYPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

2.83

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

1.86

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

1.91

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

1.52

-1.17

Drawdowns

FSRNX vs. PSYPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRNX drawdown since its inception was -44.26%, which is greater than PSYPX's maximum drawdown of -11.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRNX and PSYPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRNXPSYPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.26%

-11.43%

-32.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-1.38%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.49%

-1.77%

-15.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.27%

-3.15%

-31.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.26%

-11.43%

-32.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-0.10%

-3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-0.71%

-8.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

0.28%

+2.39%

Volatility

FSRNX vs. PSYPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Palmer Square Income Plus Fund (PSYPX) at 0.21%. This indicates that FSRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSYPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRNXPSYPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

0.21%

+3.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

1.26%

+8.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.22%

1.43%

+11.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.89%

1.84%

+17.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.40%

2.06%

+19.34%

FSRNX vs. PSYPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRNX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PSYPX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSRNX vs. PSYPX - Dividend Comparison

FSRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than PSYPX's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRNX
Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund
2.58%2.77%2.86%2.84%2.66%1.25%3.33%4.52%3.62%2.27%3.40%2.57%
PSYPX
Palmer Square Income Plus Fund
3.31%3.33%4.16%4.05%3.23%1.27%2.08%3.11%2.84%2.53%4.26%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSRNX and PSYPX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRNX has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to PSYPX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRNX dropped -44.26% vs PSYPX's -11.43%.

PSYPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRNX and PSYPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer