PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRNX vs. CLF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRNX vs. CLF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) and iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FSRNX is traded in USD, while CLF.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CLF.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRNX achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than CLF.TO's -1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRNX has outperformed CLF.TO with an annualized return of 4.32%, while CLF.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 0.74% annualized return.


FSRNX

1D
-0.06%
1M
4.13%
YTD
11.22%
6M
11.06%
1Y
12.75%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
4.32%

CLF.TO

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
-1.01%
6M
-0.23%
1Y
0.03%
3Y*
2.85%
5Y*
-1.15%
10Y*
0.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRNX vs. CLF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRNX
Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund
11.22%3.03%4.99%11.93%-26.14%40.66%-11.31%23.78%-4.91%3.15%
CLF.TO
iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF
-1.01%8.31%-3.36%7.12%-9.71%-1.22%7.37%6.88%-6.20%6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRNX and CLF.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.05

The correlation between FSRNX and CLF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.21 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRNX vs. CLF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRNX
FSRNX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FSRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

CLF.TO
CLF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CLF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRNX vs. CLF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) and iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSRNXCLF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.02

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

0.16

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

0.38

+4.19

FSRNX vs. CLF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the CLF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRNX and CLF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSRNX vs. CLF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRNX drawdown since its inception was -44.26%, which is greater than CLF.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRNX and CLF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRNXCLF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.26%

-27.88%

-16.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-3.33%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.49%

-7.33%

-10.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.27%

-17.09%

-17.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.26%

-18.06%

-26.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-11.56%

+11.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.67%

-12.27%

+2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

1.44%

+1.24%

Volatility

FSRNX vs. CLF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO) at 1.13%. This indicates that FSRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRNXCLF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

1.13%

+3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

3.63%

+6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

4.78%

+8.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

7.02%

+11.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.41%

7.41%

+14.00%

FSRNX vs. CLF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRNX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CLF.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSRNX vs. CLF.TO - Dividend Comparison

FSRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than CLF.TO's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLF.TO
iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF
2.25%2.22%2.22%2.23%2.10%1.98%2.15%2.46%2.67%2.91%3.12%3.29%
FSRNX
Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund
2.66%2.77%2.86%2.84%2.66%1.25%3.33%4.52%3.62%2.27%3.40%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSRNX and CLF.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRNX and CLF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer