FSRJX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FSRJX (Fidelity SAI Real Estate Fund) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FSRJX is a REIT fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past year, FSRJX returned 11.35% vs 44.33% for FBGRX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSRJX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FSRJX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Real Estate Fund (FSRJX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRJX achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 19.05% return.

FSRJX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -1.09%
• YTD: 11.45%
• 6M: 11.80%
• 1Y: 11.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBGRX

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: 4.78%
• YTD: 19.05%
• 6M: 18.64%
• 1Y: 44.33%
• 3Y*: 31.24%
• 5Y*: 16.32%
• 10Y*: 22.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRJX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FSRJX Fidelity SAI Real Estate Fund	11.45%	2.52%	-6.54%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	19.05%	19.91%	17.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRJX and FBGRX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024	0.14

Return for Risk

FSRJX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRJX

FSRJX Risk / Return Rank: 13
FSRJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FSRJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FSRJX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
FSRJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FSRJX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRJX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Real Estate Fund (FSRJX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSRJX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	2.34	-1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	3.03	-1.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.40	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	3.46	-2.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.16	14.31	-10.15

FSRJX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRJX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRJX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSRJX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRJX drawdown since its inception was -15.66%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRJX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSRJX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.66%	-58.64%	+42.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.83%	-12.65%	+4.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.08%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.98%	-0.34%	-2.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.27%	-12.52%	+8.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	3.06%	-0.35%

Volatility

FSRJX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity SAI Real Estate Fund (FSRJX) is 5.17%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 7.86%. This indicates that FSRJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSRJX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	7.86%	-2.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.13%	14.72%	-4.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.99%	18.71%	-4.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.72%	25.07%	-8.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.72%	23.78%	-7.06%

FSRJX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRJX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSRJX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FSRJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than FBGRX's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.60%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FSRJX Fidelity SAI Real Estate Fund	2.18%	2.52%	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSRJX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FSRJX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSRJX or FBGRX?

FBGRX has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to FSRJX (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRJX dropped -15.66% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.