FSRFX vs. ASGI
FSRFX (Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio) and ASGI (Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund) are both mutual funds - FSRFX is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while ASGI is a Infrastructure Equities fund managed by Aberdeen. Over the past 5 years, FSRFX returned 10.81%/yr vs 13.25%/yr for ASGI. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FSRFX charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.65%/yr for ASGI.
Performance
FSRFX vs. ASGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSRFX achieves a 17.17% return, which is significantly higher than ASGI's 14.30% return.
FSRFX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- 6M
- 13.80%
- YTD
- 17.17%
- 1Y
- 32.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.30%
ASGI
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- YTD
- 14.30%
- 1Y
- 26.22%
- 3Y*
- 23.17%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.02M | $5.06M | $4.09M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FSRFX vs. ASGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRFX Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio | 17.17% | 11.45% | 6.33% | 19.29% | -10.21% | 27.79% | 27.61% |
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 14.30% | 44.20% | 10.26% | 14.48% | -10.50% | 18.17% | -4.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSRFX and ASGI is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.42 |
The correlation between FSRFX and ASGI shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSRFX vs. ASGI — Risk / Return Rank
FSRFX
ASGI
FSRFX vs. ASGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio (FSRFX) and Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSRFX | ASGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 1.73 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 5.33 | +3.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSRFX vs. ASGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRFX drawdown since its inception was -60.34%, which is greater than ASGI's maximum drawdown of -23.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRFX and ASGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSRFX | ASGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.34% | -23.71% | -36.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.69% | -15.15% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -15.15% | -10.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.23% | -22.49% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.10% | -2.65% | -2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -5.95% | -2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 4.91% | -1.50% |
Volatility
FSRFX vs. ASGI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio (FSRFX) is 4.07%, while Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that FSRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSRFX | ASGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 5.86% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.44% | 16.98% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 19.70% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 16.92% | +3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.85% | 17.55% | +4.30% |
FSRFX vs. ASGI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRFX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ASGI's 1.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSRFX vs. ASGI - Dividend Comparison
FSRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.94%, less than ASGI's 10.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 10.96% | 10.96% | 12.84% | 8.03% | 8.25% | 6.33% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSRFX Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio | 7.94% | 4.18% | 7.02% | 2.68% | 8.82% | 12.00% | 7.97% | 3.98% | 11.42% | 5.16% | 1.97% | 7.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSRFX and ASGI have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASGI has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to FSRFX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRFX dropped -60.34% vs ASGI's -23.71%.
FSRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSRFX and ASGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer