PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRAX vs. FSIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRAX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class A (FSRAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSRAX having a 8.56% return and FSIRX slightly higher at 8.63%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSRAX having a 5.48% annualized return and FSIRX not far ahead at 5.75%.


FSRAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.82%
1Y
16.14%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*
5.48%

FSIRX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
8.63%
6M
8.87%
1Y
16.32%
3Y*
10.11%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
5.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRAX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class A
8.56%10.09%5.58%4.32%-3.58%15.53%3.49%10.27%-4.26%3.76%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
8.63%10.38%5.83%4.58%-3.34%15.89%3.72%10.55%-3.99%4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRAX and FSIRX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2005

0.98

The correlation between FSRAX and FSIRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRAX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRAX
FSRAX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FSRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FSIRX
FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRAX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class A (FSRAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSRAXFSIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.70

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.94

8.11

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.67

31.78

-1.11

FSRAX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is comparable to the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRAX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSRAXFSIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46

3.52

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.90

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.86

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.61

-0.05

Drawdowns

FSRAX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRAX drawdown since its inception was -33.52%, roughly equal to the maximum FSIRX drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRAX and FSIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRAXFSIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.52%

-33.39%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.06%

-2.05%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.78%

-5.81%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.89%

-12.82%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.00%

-19.98%

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.83%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-4.17%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

0.52%

+0.01%

Volatility

FSRAX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class A (FSRAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) have volatilities of 1.36% and 1.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRAXFSIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.31%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.75%

3.77%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.73%

4.74%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.93%

6.92%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.78%

6.74%

+0.04%

FSRAX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRAX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSRAX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

FSRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than FSIRX's 4.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
4.19%4.72%4.80%5.28%7.33%5.37%2.23%3.09%9.42%2.63%2.37%1.75%
FSRAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class A
3.91%4.45%4.56%5.04%7.08%5.16%2.02%2.83%9.13%2.30%2.08%1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FSRAX and FSIRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSRAX has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to FSIRX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRAX dropped -33.52% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 3.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRAX and FSIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer