PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSPWX vs. FGOMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSPWX vs. FGOMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSPWX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSPWX achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than FGOMX's 32.79% return.


FSPWX

1D
0.30%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.23%
6M
1.33%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FGOMX

1D
3.12%
1M
6.77%
YTD
32.79%
6M
34.82%
1Y
59.40%
3Y*
25.08%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSPWX vs. FGOMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FSPWX and FGOMX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSPWX vs. FGOMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSPWX
FSPWX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FSPWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FGOMX
FGOMX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FGOMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGOMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGOMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FGOMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGOMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSPWX vs. FGOMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSPWX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSPWXFGOMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.62

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

5.73

-3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

20.97

-14.45

FSPWX vs. FGOMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSPWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the FGOMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSPWX and FGOMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSPWX vs. FGOMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSPWX drawdown since its inception was -3.84%, smaller than the maximum FGOMX drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPWX and FGOMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSPWXFGOMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-40.14%

+36.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.95%

-12.77%

+10.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.70%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-13.29%

+12.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

3.23%

-2.59%

Volatility

FSPWX vs. FGOMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSPWX) is 1.16%, while Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX) has a volatility of 11.06%. This indicates that FSPWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGOMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSPWXFGOMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

11.06%

-9.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.40%

18.35%

-15.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.32%

21.24%

-17.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.06%

18.38%

-14.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.06%

19.57%

-15.51%

FSPWX vs. FGOMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSPWX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FGOMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSPWX vs. FGOMX - Dividend Comparison

FSPWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than FGOMX's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FGOMX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
1.63%2.17%2.40%2.83%2.42%4.63%0.73%2.13%
FSPWX
Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
3.78%4.19%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSPWX and FGOMX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGOMX has higher volatility (11.06%) compared to FSPWX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSPWX dropped -3.84% vs FGOMX's -40.14%.

FGOMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSPWX and FGOMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer