PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSPHX vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSPHX vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSPHX achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FSPHX has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of 9.33%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.80% annualized return.


FSPHX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-3.05%
6M
8.26%
YTD
8.26%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
8.66%
5Y*
2.62%
10Y*
9.33%
ALL TIME*
14.31%

XLV

1D
-0.09%
1M
-1.00%
6M
6.09%
YTD
5.61%
1Y
24.00%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
9.80%
ALL TIME*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$1.64B$1.62B$1.65B

FSPHX vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSPHX
Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio
8.26%9.36%4.91%4.13%-12.82%11.58%24.57%31.48%7.15%23.83%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
5.61%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FSPHX and XLV is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.81

The correlation between FSPHX and XLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSPHX vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSPHX
FSPHX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FSPHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSPHX vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSPHXXLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.27

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

2.30

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

5.50

-3.01

FSPHX vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSPHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSPHX and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSPHX vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSPHX drawdown since its inception was -44.45%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPHX and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSPHXXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.45%

-39.17%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.32%

-10.47%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.32%

-17.11%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.31%

-17.11%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.31%

-28.40%

-0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.27%

-3.09%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.81%

-7.09%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.62%

4.38%

+4.24%

Volatility

FSPHX vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) have volatilities of 5.07% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSPHXXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

5.31%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.62%

12.05%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.77%

15.63%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.60%

15.03%

+3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.06%

16.67%

+2.39%

FSPHX vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSPHX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSPHX vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

FSPHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.25%, more than XLV's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPHX
Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio
11.25%4.16%10.77%0.00%2.13%9.06%11.29%1.35%9.02%2.27%0.18%11.63%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.56%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSPHX and XLV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLV has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to FSPHX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSPHX dropped -44.45% vs XLV's -39.17%.

XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSPHX and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer