FSPHX vs. RSPH

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FSPHX (Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio) and RSPH (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. FSPHX is actively managed, while RSPH is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSPHX returned 9.33%/yr vs 8.83%/yr for RSPH. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FSPHX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPH.

Performance

FSPHX vs. RSPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSPHX achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly lower than RSPH's 10.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FSPHX has outperformed RSPH with an annualized return of 9.33%, while RSPH has yielded a comparatively lower 8.83% annualized return.

FSPHX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -3.05%
• 6M: 8.26%
• YTD: 8.26%
• 1Y: 19.90%
• 3Y*: 8.66%
• 5Y*: 2.62%
• 10Y*: 9.33%
• ALL TIME*: 14.31%

RSPH

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 2.00%
• 6M: 10.25%
• YTD: 10.98%
• 1Y: 25.23%
• 3Y*: 6.90%
• 5Y*: 3.35%
• 10Y*: 8.83%
• ALL TIME*: 11.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSPHX Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF	$2.72M	$3.62M	$4.91M

FSPHX vs. RSPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSPHX Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio	8.26%	9.36%	4.91%	4.13%	-12.82%	11.58%	24.57%	31.48%	7.15%	23.83%
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF	10.98%	9.52%	-0.94%	3.95%	-9.40%	23.19%	18.83%	25.48%	-0.66%	23.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FSPHX and RSPH is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006	0.87

The correlation between FSPHX and RSPH shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSPHX vs. RSPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSPHX

FSPHX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FSPHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FSPHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FSPHX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FSPHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
FSPHX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

RSPH

RSPH Risk / Return Rank: 57
RSPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RSPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RSPH Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RSPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
RSPH Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSPHX vs. RSPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSPHX	RSPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.59	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	2.40	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.28	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	2.33	-1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.49	5.93	-3.44

FSPHX vs. RSPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSPHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the RSPH Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSPHX and RSPH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSPHX vs. RSPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSPHX drawdown since its inception was -44.45%, which is greater than RSPH's maximum drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPHX and RSPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSPHX	RSPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.45%	-40.49%	-3.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.32%	-10.87%	-7.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.32%	-17.13%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.31%	-21.95%	-7.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.31%	-30.44%	+1.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.27%	0.00%	-4.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.81%	-6.11%	-3.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.62%	4.27%	+4.35%

Volatility

FSPHX vs. RSPH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) is 5.07%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that FSPHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSPHX	RSPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	5.40%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.62%	12.03%	+1.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.77%	15.97%	+2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.60%	16.56%	+2.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.06%	17.80%	+1.26%

FSPHX vs. RSPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSPHX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPH's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSPHX vs. RSPH - Dividend Comparison

FSPHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.25%, more than RSPH's 0.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSPHX Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio	11.25%	4.16%	10.77%	0.00%	2.13%	9.06%	11.29%	1.35%	9.02%	2.27%	0.18%	11.63%
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF	0.66%	0.70%	0.71%	0.66%	0.64%	0.50%	0.51%	0.54%	0.53%	0.47%	0.48%	0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSPHX and RSPH in my portfolio?

FSPHX and RSPH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSPHX or RSPH?

RSPH has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to FSPHX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSPHX dropped -44.45% vs RSPH's -40.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.