PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSPGX vs. VSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSPGX vs. VSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSPGX achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than VSPGX's 14.87% return.


FSPGX

1D
-0.38%
1M
7.10%
YTD
8.60%
6M
7.98%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*

VSPGX

1D
-0.16%
1M
8.46%
YTD
14.87%
6M
14.68%
1Y
35.30%
3Y*
28.49%
5Y*
16.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSPGX vs. VSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
8.60%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%24.27%
VSPGX
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
14.87%21.91%35.48%30.38%-29.46%31.88%33.34%31.06%-0.05%23.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FSPGX and VSPGX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.99

The correlation between FSPGX and VSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSPGX vs. VSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VSPGX
VSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
VSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSPGX vs. VSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSPGXVSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

2.66

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

11.05

-5.15

FSPGX vs. VSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the VSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSPGX and VSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSPGXVSPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.28

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.78

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.88

+0.01

Drawdowns

FSPGX vs. VSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSPGX drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, roughly equal to the maximum VSPGX drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPGX and VSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSPGXVSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-32.73%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.17%

-13.68%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.32%

-22.34%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-32.73%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.16%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-6.78%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.81%

3.28%

+1.53%

Volatility

FSPGX vs. VSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) is 3.32%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSPGX) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that FSPGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSPGXVSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

4.20%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

12.45%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.39%

15.94%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.49%

21.27%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.55%

21.35%

+0.20%

FSPGX vs. VSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSPGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VSPGX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSPGX vs. VSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than VSPGX's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.32%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%
VSPGX
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.45%0.38%0.50%1.14%0.95%0.55%0.89%0.68%0.31%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FSPGX and VSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VSPGX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to FSPGX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSPGX dropped -32.66% vs VSPGX's -32.73%.

VSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSPGX and VSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer