PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSPGX vs. FSSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSPGX vs. FSSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSPGX achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than FSSNX's 18.72% return.


FSPGX

1D
-0.38%
1M
7.10%
YTD
8.60%
6M
7.98%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*

FSSNX

1D
0.91%
1M
4.97%
YTD
18.72%
6M
17.45%
1Y
41.33%
3Y*
18.75%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSPGX vs. FSSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
8.60%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%27.70%
FSSNX
Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund
18.72%12.94%11.71%17.11%-20.28%14.70%19.99%25.70%-11.24%13.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FSPGX and FSSNX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.71

The correlation between FSPGX and FSSNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSPGX vs. FSSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FSSNX
FSSNX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FSSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FSSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSPGX vs. FSSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSPGXFSSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

3.98

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

14.13

-8.23

FSPGX vs. FSSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FSSNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSPGX and FSSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSPGXFSSNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.29

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.30

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.54

+0.36

Drawdowns

FSPGX vs. FSSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSPGX drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum FSSNX drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPGX and FSSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSPGXFSSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-41.72%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.17%

-11.00%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.32%

-27.45%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-31.87%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.14%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-8.29%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.81%

3.09%

+1.72%

Volatility

FSPGX vs. FSSNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) is 3.32%, while Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that FSPGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSPGXFSSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

5.59%

-2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

13.59%

-2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.39%

19.13%

-3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.49%

22.58%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.55%

23.45%

-1.90%

FSPGX vs. FSSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSPGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FSSNX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSPGX vs. FSSNX - Dividend Comparison

FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than FSSNX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.32%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%0.00%0.00%
FSSNX
Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund
0.91%1.08%1.04%1.43%1.26%3.92%0.94%2.96%4.94%3.37%2.27%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSPGX and FSSNX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSSNX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to FSPGX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSPGX dropped -32.66% vs FSSNX's -41.72%.

FSSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSPGX and FSSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer