PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSNZX vs. FTLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSNZX vs. FTLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund Class K (FSNZX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSNZX achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly higher than FTLSX's 5.19% return.


FSNZX

1D
0.58%
1M
4.97%
YTD
13.49%
6M
15.34%
1Y
30.88%
3Y*
20.63%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*

FTLSX

1D
0.28%
1M
1.89%
YTD
5.19%
6M
5.44%
1Y
12.01%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSNZX vs. FTLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSNZX
Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund Class K
13.49%23.75%14.20%20.66%-18.25%16.70%18.36%25.55%-8.89%7.39%
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
5.19%10.31%4.72%8.60%-11.33%3.30%9.04%10.97%-1.40%2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FSNZX and FTLSX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.73

The correlation between FSNZX and FTLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSNZX vs. FTLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSNZX
FSNZX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FSNZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSNZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSNZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FSNZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSNZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FTLSX
FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSNZX vs. FTLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund Class K (FSNZX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSNZXFTLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.55

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

3.32

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.55

14.65

-0.10

FSNZX vs. FTLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSNZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FTLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSNZX and FTLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSNZXFTLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.67

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.65

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.96

-0.22

Drawdowns

FSNZX vs. FTLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSNZX drawdown since its inception was -30.92%, which is greater than FTLSX's maximum drawdown of -15.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSNZX and FTLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSNZXFTLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.92%

-15.74%

-15.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.53%

-3.65%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.40%

-4.83%

-10.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.30%

-15.74%

-11.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-2.81%

-2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

0.82%

+1.33%

Volatility

FSNZX vs. FTLSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund Class K (FSNZX) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) at 1.79%. This indicates that FSNZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSNZXFTLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

1.79%

+2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

3.80%

+6.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

4.54%

+8.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

5.43%

+9.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.96%

4.78%

+11.18%

FSNZX vs. FTLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSNZX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FTLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSNZX vs. FTLSX - Dividend Comparison

FSNZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than FTLSX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSNZX
Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund Class K
5.81%4.41%2.26%1.99%12.13%12.05%5.08%6.60%7.94%2.87%
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
3.53%3.68%3.37%3.19%5.28%4.91%3.06%4.44%4.26%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSNZX and FTLSX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSNZX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to FTLSX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSNZX dropped -30.92% vs FTLSX's -15.74%.

FTLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSNZX and FTLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer