PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSNUX vs. CDDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSNUX vs. CDDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund Class K (FSNUX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSNUX achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly higher than CDDYX's 8.15% return.


FSNUX

1D
0.42%
1M
3.76%
YTD
10.03%
6M
11.30%
1Y
23.62%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*

CDDYX

1D
0.94%
1M
1.47%
YTD
8.15%
6M
8.50%
1Y
20.48%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSNUX vs. CDDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSNUX
Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund Class K
10.03%19.34%13.94%17.79%-18.35%14.50%17.33%24.55%-8.27%5.89%
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
8.15%15.95%15.17%10.65%-4.84%26.43%7.92%28.74%-4.27%9.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FSNUX and CDDYX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.82

The correlation between FSNUX and CDDYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSNUX vs. CDDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSNUX
FSNUX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FSNUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSNUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSNUX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FSNUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSNUX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CDDYX
CDDYX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CDDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CDDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSNUX vs. CDDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund Class K (FSNUX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSNUXCDDYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

2.33

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.53

3.33

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.41

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.83

-0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.00

14.44

-0.44

FSNUX vs. CDDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSNUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the CDDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSNUX and CDDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSNUXCDDYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.33

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.82

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.88

-0.15

Drawdowns

FSNUX vs. CDDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSNUX drawdown since its inception was -28.85%, smaller than the maximum CDDYX drawdown of -32.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSNUX and CDDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSNUXCDDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.85%

-32.74%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

-5.51%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.58%

-12.99%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.87%

-16.91%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.30%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-2.77%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.46%

+0.25%

Volatility

FSNUX vs. CDDYX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund Class K (FSNUX) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) at 2.48%. This indicates that FSNUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSNUXCDDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

2.48%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.97%

6.87%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.65%

9.07%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.45%

13.27%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.96%

15.69%

-1.73%

FSNUX vs. CDDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSNUX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CDDYX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSNUX vs. CDDYX - Dividend Comparison

FSNUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, more than CDDYX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
4.97%5.33%5.99%4.96%3.90%2.93%1.85%3.28%7.65%4.03%3.84%8.35%
FSNUX
Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund Class K
5.90%5.08%5.51%2.03%10.34%11.67%6.01%6.85%7.77%1.74%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSNUX and CDDYX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSNUX has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to CDDYX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSNUX dropped -28.85% vs CDDYX's -32.74%.

FSNUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSNUX and CDDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer