FSNLX vs. FIRVX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FSNLX (Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K) and FIRVX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FSNLX returned 4.58%/yr vs 597.67%/yr for FIRVX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.47% expense ratio.

Performance

FSNLX vs. FIRVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K (FSNLX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSNLX achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly lower than FIRVX's 1,440,933.92% return.

FSNLX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: 6.46%
• 6M: 6.56%
• 1Y: 14.72%
• 3Y*: 10.19%
• 5Y*: 4.58%
• 10Y*: —

FIRVX

• 1D: 1,371,718.18%
• 1M: 1,382,668.54%
• YTD: 1,440,933.92%
• 6M: 1,442,468.36%
• 1Y: 1,545,588.89%
• 3Y*: 2,512.79%
• 5Y*: 597.67%
• 10Y*: 176.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSNLX vs. FIRVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSNLX Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K	6.46%	13.23%	6.29%	11.43%	-14.53%	7.36%	12.32%	16.37%	-4.36%	3.37%
FIRVX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund	1,440,933.92%	12.25%	5.86%	10.72%	-14.63%	6.77%	12.06%	16.19%	-4.45%	4.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FSNLX and FIRVX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2017	0.99

The correlation between FSNLX and FIRVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSNLX vs. FIRVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSNLX

FSNLX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FSNLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FSNLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FSNLX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FSNLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FSNLX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FIRVX

FIRVX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FIRVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FIRVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FIRVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FIRVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FIRVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSNLX vs. FIRVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K (FSNLX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSNLX	FIRVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	1.17	+1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	351,355.56	-351,352.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	49,085.82	-49,084.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	356,370.91	-356,367.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.54	1,512,145.77	-1,512,132.23

FSNLX vs. FIRVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSNLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the FIRVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSNLX and FIRVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSNLX vs. FIRVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSNLX drawdown since its inception was -20.41%, smaller than the maximum FIRVX drawdown of -40.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSNLX and FIRVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSNLX	FIRVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.41%	-40.59%	+20.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.70%	-4.51%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.76%	-6.52%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.41%	-20.10%	-0.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.04%	-4.97%	+0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	1.06%	+0.03%

Volatility

FSNLX vs. FIRVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K (FSNLX) is 2.81%, while Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX) has a volatility of 952.63%. This indicates that FSNLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIRVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSNLX	FIRVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.81%	952.63%	-949.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.50%	952.62%	-947.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.38%	1,374,447.92%	-1,374,441.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.68%	614,671.81%	-614,664.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.90%	434,465.54%	-434,457.64%

FSNLX vs. FIRVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FSNLX and FIRVX have an expense ratio of 0.47%.

Dividends

FSNLX vs. FIRVX - Dividend Comparison

FSNLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, less than FIRVX's 102.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIRVX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund	102.87%	2.83%	2.74%	2.57%	3.52%	4.61%	3.74%	3.18%	6.90%	25.16%	2.28%	4.45%
FSNLX Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K	6.43%	6.50%	4.02%	2.74%	8.44%	10.79%	6.72%	6.77%	8.21%	2.16%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSNLX and FIRVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FSNLX and FIRVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSNLX or FIRVX?

FIRVX has higher volatility (952.63%) compared to FSNLX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSNLX dropped -20.41% vs FIRVX's -40.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSNLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.