FSMTX vs. FSPGX
FSMTX (Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FSMTX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FSMTX returned 1.02%/yr vs 16.03%/yr for FSPGX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSMTX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.
Performance
FSMTX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMTX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 8.60% return.
FSMTX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 5.80%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- —
FSPGX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 7.10%
- YTD
- 8.60%
- 6M
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 25.53%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- —
FSMTX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMTX Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund | 0.57% | 7.65% | 2.93% | 7.33% | -13.30% | -0.30% | 8.13% | 9.87% | 1.41% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 8.60% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 38.46% | 36.38% | -7.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMTX and FSPGX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2018 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSMTX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
FSMTX
FSPGX
FSMTX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund (FSMTX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSMTX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 1.85 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 2.50 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 1.76 | +0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.19 | 5.90 | +0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSMTX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.85 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.75 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.90 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
FSMTX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMTX drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, smaller than the maximum FSPGX drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMTX and FSPGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMTX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.89% | -32.66% | +14.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.86% | -16.17% | +13.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.85% | -23.32% | +17.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | -32.66% | +14.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -0.38% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -6.37% | +1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 4.81% | -3.85% |
Volatility
FSMTX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund (FSMTX) is 1.36%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that FSMTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSMTX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 3.32% | -1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 11.58% | -8.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93% | 15.39% | -11.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.70% | 21.49% | -15.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.22% | 21.55% | -16.33% |
FSMTX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMTX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSMTX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison
FSMTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMTX Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund | 4.56% | 4.56% | 4.70% | 4.29% | 2.59% | 2.74% | 5.36% | 4.93% | 0.62% | 0.00% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSMTX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSPGX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to FSMTX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMTX dropped -17.89% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.
FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSMTX and FSPGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer