PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMTX vs. FIWDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMTX vs. FIWDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund (FSMTX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMTX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than FIWDX's 3.40% return.


FSMTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.55%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
1.02%
10Y*

FIWDX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.18%
YTD
3.40%
6M
3.74%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMTX vs. FIWDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FSMTX
Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund
0.57%7.65%2.93%7.33%-13.30%-0.30%8.13%9.87%1.41%
FIWDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z
3.40%8.98%6.07%9.20%-11.76%3.51%7.60%11.20%-0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMTX and FIWDX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2018

0.74

The correlation between FSMTX and FIWDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMTX vs. FIWDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMTX
FSMTX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FSMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FIWDX
FIWDX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FIWDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMTX vs. FIWDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund (FSMTX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMTXFIWDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.64

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

3.98

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.19

17.17

-10.98

FSMTX vs. FIWDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the FIWDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMTX and FIWDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMTXFIWDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.96

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.74

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.93

-0.37

Drawdowns

FSMTX vs. FIWDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMTX drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, which is greater than FIWDX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMTX and FIWDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMTXFIWDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.89%

-15.96%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-2.61%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.85%

-3.97%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

-15.96%

-1.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

0.00%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-3.20%

-1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.60%

+0.36%

Volatility

FSMTX vs. FIWDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund (FSMTX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX) have volatilities of 1.36% and 1.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMTXFIWDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.39%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

2.93%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

3.51%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.70%

4.54%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.22%

4.88%

+0.34%

FSMTX vs. FIWDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMTX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FIWDX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMTX vs. FIWDX - Dividend Comparison

FSMTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than FIWDX's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FIWDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z
4.34%4.39%4.21%4.02%2.99%4.28%4.62%4.39%1.13%
FSMTX
Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund
4.56%4.56%4.70%4.29%2.59%2.74%5.36%4.93%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMTX and FIWDX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIWDX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to FSMTX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMTX dropped -17.89% vs FIWDX's -15.96%.

FIWDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMTX and FIWDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer