PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMOX vs. MCDWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMOX vs. MCDWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FSMOX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMOX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly higher than MCDWX's 0.56% return.


FSMOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.11%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
10Y*

MCDWX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.69%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMOX vs. MCDWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FSMOX
Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund
0.98%8.52%1.45%1.16%
MCDWX
Manning & Napier Credit Series
0.56%7.57%4.13%4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMOX and MCDWX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023

0.89

The correlation between FSMOX and MCDWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMOX vs. MCDWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMOX
FSMOX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FSMOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

MCDWX
MCDWX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MCDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MCDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMOX vs. MCDWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FSMOX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMOXMCDWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.59

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.25

8.42

-0.17

FSMOX vs. MCDWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the MCDWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMOX and MCDWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMOXMCDWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.91

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.59

+0.05

Drawdowns

FSMOX vs. MCDWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMOX drawdown since its inception was -8.65%, smaller than the maximum MCDWX drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMOX and MCDWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMOXMCDWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-15.96%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-2.17%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.47%

-4.22%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.95%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-4.15%

+2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.66%

+0.21%

Volatility

FSMOX vs. MCDWX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FSMOX) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) at 1.06%. This indicates that FSMOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCDWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMOXMCDWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

1.06%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

2.17%

+0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04%

2.95%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.21%

4.63%

+1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.21%

4.38%

+1.83%

FSMOX vs. MCDWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMOX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than MCDWX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMOX vs. MCDWX - Dividend Comparison

FSMOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, which matches MCDWX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FSMOX
Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund
4.46%4.44%5.07%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MCDWX
Manning & Napier Credit Series
4.47%4.83%4.41%4.48%3.25%4.45%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMOX and MCDWX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMOX has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to MCDWX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMOX dropped -8.65% vs MCDWX's -15.96%.

MCDWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMOX and MCDWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer