FSMOX vs. CLDAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FSMOX (Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund) and CLDAX (Calvert Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, FSMOX returned 4.19%/yr vs 3.35%/yr for CLDAX. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FSMOX charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CLDAX.

Performance

FSMOX vs. CLDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FSMOX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMOX achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly higher than CLDAX's -1.10% return.

FSMOX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -1.01%
• 6M: -0.37%
• YTD: 0.15%
• 1Y: 3.63%
• 3Y*: 4.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.46%

CLDAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.28%
• 6M: -1.32%
• YTD: -1.10%
• 1Y: 1.34%
• 3Y*: 3.35%
• 5Y*: -0.72%
• 10Y*: 2.49%
• ALL TIME*: 5.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FSMOX Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FSMOX vs. CLDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FSMOX Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund	0.15%	8.52%	1.45%	1.16%
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund	-1.10%	7.27%	1.39%	2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMOX and CLDAX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2023	0.95

The correlation between FSMOX and CLDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSMOX vs. CLDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSMOX

FSMOX Risk / Return Rank: 41
FSMOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FSMOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FSMOX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FSMOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FSMOX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

CLDAX

CLDAX Risk / Return Rank: 16
CLDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
CLDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
CLDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CLDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
CLDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSMOX vs. CLDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FSMOX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSMOX	CLDAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	0.68	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	0.99	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.12	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	0.81	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.77	2.04	+2.72

FSMOX vs. CLDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the CLDAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMOX and CLDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSMOX vs. CLDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMOX drawdown since its inception was -8.65%, smaller than the maximum CLDAX drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMOX and CLDAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSMOX	CLDAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.65%	-18.88%	+10.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.84%	-3.24%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.98%	-5.21%	-1.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.98%	-4.49%	+2.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-3.91%	+2.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	1.28%	-0.25%

Volatility

FSMOX vs. CLDAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FSMOX) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) at 0.97%. This indicates that FSMOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSMOX	CLDAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.06%	0.97%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.07%	3.13%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.96%	3.87%	+0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.11%	5.66%	+0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.11%	6.76%	-0.65%

FSMOX vs. CLDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMOX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CLDAX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSMOX vs. CLDAX - Dividend Comparison

FSMOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than CLDAX's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund	3.92%	4.24%	4.16%	3.17%	1.80%	6.08%	5.22%	3.04%	3.63%	3.02%	7.02%	2.85%
FSMOX Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund	4.14%	4.44%	5.07%	1.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSMOX and CLDAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FSMOX and CLDAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSMOX or CLDAX?

FSMOX has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to CLDAX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMOX dropped -8.65% vs CLDAX's -18.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSMOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.