FSMEX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
FSMEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 28, 1998. FSPSX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Performance
FSMEX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSMEX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMEX Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio | -17.58% | 8.13% | 18.37% | 0.62% | -24.84% | 24.56% | 30.18% | 29.58% | 15.98% | 26.66% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | -1.94% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 18.31% | -14.23% | 11.45% | 8.16% | 22.03% | -13.55% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMEX achieves a -17.58% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's -1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FSMEX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 10.46%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.65% annualized return.
FSMEX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -11.19%
- YTD
- -17.58%
- 6M
- -11.01%
- 1Y
- -8.83%
- 3Y*
- 0.36%
- 5Y*
- -0.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
FSPSX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 19.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSMEX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMEX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSMEX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FSMEX
FSPSX
FSMEX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSMEX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | 1.11 | -1.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | 1.56 | -2.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.23 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 1.54 | -2.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.55 | 5.93 | -7.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSMEX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 | 1.11 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.51 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.53 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.46 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMEX and FSPSX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FSMEX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
FSMEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, more than FSPSX's 3.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMEX Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio | 12.78% | 10.53% | 17.04% | 0.00% | 1.80% | 8.12% | 6.65% | 1.77% | 7.47% | 6.26% | 5.84% | 16.35% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.22% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
FSMEX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMEX drawdown since its inception was -40.34%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMEX and FSPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMEX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.34% | -33.69% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.04% | -11.39% | -9.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.34% | -29.41% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.34% | -33.69% | -6.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.82% | -10.86% | -11.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -6.59% | -1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 2.96% | +3.54% |
Volatility
FSMEX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) is 5.85%, while Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that FSMEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSMEX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 7.04% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 10.63% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 16.79% | +4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 15.77% | +4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 16.47% | +4.12% |