PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMD vs. DISSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMD vs. DISSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund (DISSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSMD having a 14.94% return and DISSX slightly higher at 15.12%.


FSMD

1D
0.90%
1M
3.02%
YTD
14.94%
6M
15.74%
1Y
26.74%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*

DISSX

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.63%
YTD
15.12%
6M
15.47%
1Y
33.01%
3Y*
13.01%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*
9.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMD vs. DISSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
14.94%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%8.94%8.81%
DISSX
BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund
15.12%5.41%6.87%14.24%-16.71%26.41%10.92%5.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMD and DISSX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.95

The correlation between FSMD and DISSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMD vs. DISSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

DISSX
DISSX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DISSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DISSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DISSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DISSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DISSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMD vs. DISSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund (DISSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMDDISSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

1.86

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.55

2.70

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.66

-0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.42

12.25

-0.84

FSMD vs. DISSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the DISSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMD and DISSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMDDISSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

1.86

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.21

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.40

+0.15

Drawdowns

FSMD vs. DISSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, smaller than the maximum DISSX drawdown of -58.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and DISSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMDDISSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.67%

-58.30%

+17.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-8.75%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.16%

-29.02%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.16%

-29.02%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.93%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-9.57%

+3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.62%

-0.28%

Volatility

FSMD vs. DISSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund (DISSX) have volatilities of 4.50% and 4.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMDDISSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

4.41%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.39%

11.71%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

17.60%

-2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

21.49%

-3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.43%

23.17%

-1.74%

FSMD vs. DISSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DISSX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMD vs. DISSX - Dividend Comparison

FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than DISSX's 13.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DISSX
BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund
13.40%15.42%14.79%8.20%13.87%10.72%7.61%8.35%13.18%7.40%6.49%11.30%
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.21%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FSMD and DISSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSMD has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to DISSX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs DISSX's -58.30%.

DISSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMD and DISSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer