FSMD vs. DFAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT).
FSMD and DFAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FSMD is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. It was launched on Feb 26, 2019. DFAT is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Jun 14, 2021.
Performance
FSMD vs. DFAT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSMD vs. DFAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.72% | 8.70% | 15.18% | 17.37% | -11.15% | 5.65% |
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF | 5.24% | 8.73% | 7.80% | 20.86% | -6.23% | 5.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than DFAT's 5.24% return.
FSMD
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 15.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.84%
- 10Y*
- —
DFAT
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- YTD
- 5.24%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 23.33%
- 3Y*
- 13.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSMD vs. DFAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAT's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSMD vs. DFAT — Risk / Return Rank
FSMD
DFAT
FSMD vs. DFAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSMD | DFAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 1.05 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 1.57 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 1.60 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 5.87 | -0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSMD | DFAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.05 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.39 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMD and DFAT is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSMD vs. DFAT - Dividend Comparison
FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than DFAT's 1.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.37% | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.18% | 1.32% | 1.37% |
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF | 1.56% | 1.55% | 1.31% | 1.34% | 1.34% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FSMD vs. DFAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, which is greater than DFAT's maximum drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and DFAT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMD | DFAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.67% | -26.12% | -14.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.63% | -14.60% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.65% | -6.07% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -6.42% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 3.99% | -0.98% |
Volatility
FSMD vs. DFAT - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) at 5.24%. This indicates that FSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSMD | DFAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 5.24% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 12.13% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 22.40% | -2.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 21.72% | -3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 21.72% | -0.18% |