PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMD vs. BKSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMD vs. BKSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 15.80% return, which is significantly lower than BKSE's 18.16% return.


FSMD

1D
-0.12%
1M
-1.72%
6M
11.82%
YTD
15.80%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.65%

BKSE

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.69%
6M
12.42%
YTD
18.16%
1Y
34.85%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$332.93K$229.57K$249.71K
$4.61M$5.11M$5.82M

FSMD vs. BKSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
15.80%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%47.04%
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
18.16%13.09%9.56%22.37%-18.44%16.18%53.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMD and BKSE is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2020

0.95

The correlation between FSMD and BKSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSMD vs. BKSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSMD
BKSE

Technology

20.9%
16.0%

Industrials

20.3%
14.9%

Financial Services

15.2%
16.4%

Healthcare

12.2%
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
13.5%

Real Estate

6.1%
7.2%

Energy

3.7%
5.9%

Basic Materials

3.5%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
2.6%

Communication Services

2.8%
2.0%

Utilities

1.9%
3.1%

Technology

FSMD
20.9%
BKSE
16.0%

Industrials

FSMD
20.3%
BKSE
14.9%

Financial Services

FSMD
15.2%
BKSE
16.4%

Healthcare

FSMD
12.2%
BKSE
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FSMD
10.6%
BKSE
13.5%

Real Estate

FSMD
6.1%
BKSE
7.2%

Energy

FSMD
3.7%
BKSE
5.9%

Basic Materials

FSMD
3.5%
BKSE
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

FSMD
2.9%
BKSE
2.6%

Communication Services

FSMD
2.8%
BKSE
2.0%

Utilities

FSMD
1.9%
BKSE
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMD vs. BKSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BKSE
BKSE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BKSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKSE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BKSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKSE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSMD vs. BKSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMDBKSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.47

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

12.47

-3.38

FSMD vs. BKSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the BKSE Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMD and BKSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSMD vs. BKSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, which is greater than BKSE's maximum drawdown of -29.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and BKSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMDBKSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.67%

-29.08%

-11.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-9.40%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.16%

-26.76%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.16%

-29.08%

+6.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.99%

-1.42%

-2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.92%

-8.85%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.62%

-0.10%

Volatility

FSMD vs. BKSE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) at 3.37%. This indicates that FSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMDBKSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

3.37%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

11.92%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.87%

17.42%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.54%

21.34%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.32%

22.12%

-0.80%

FSMD vs. BKSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BKSE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSMD vs. BKSE - Dividend Comparison

FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than BKSE's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
1.21%1.26%1.55%1.38%1.50%1.17%0.82%0.00%
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.25%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FSMD and BKSE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSMD has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to BKSE (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs BKSE's -29.08%.

On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 9.94% vs 8.43% for BKSE. On fees, BKSE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKSE has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 9.94% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKSE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FSMD.

FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 1.21% for BKSE.

FSMD is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while BKSE is Small Cap Growth Equities. FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while BKSE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FSMD and 0.04% for BKSE.

BKSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMD and BKSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer