FSMD vs. BIV
FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) and BIV (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSMD is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while BIV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSMD returned 10.00%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for BIV. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSMD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BIV.
Performance
FSMD vs. BIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly higher than BIV's -0.06% return.
FSMD
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- 17.58%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- —
BIV
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.89%
FSMD vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 17.58% | 8.70% | 15.18% | 17.37% | -11.15% | 26.40% | 8.94% | 8.81% |
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | -0.06% | 8.52% | 1.57% | 6.07% | -13.21% | -2.40% | 9.67% | 8.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMD and BIV is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019 | 0.08 |
Over the past year, FSMD and BIV have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSMD vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank
FSMD
BIV
FSMD vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSMD | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.19 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 1.36 | +1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.89 | 3.90 | +7.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSMD vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, which is greater than BIV's maximum drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and BIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMD | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.67% | -18.95% | -21.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -3.18% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.16% | -6.07% | -16.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.16% | -18.74% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.86% | +1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -3.39% | -2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 1.10% | +1.24% |
Volatility
FSMD vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) at 1.45%. This indicates that FSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSMD | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 1.45% | +3.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 2.98% | +8.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 4.03% | +11.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 6.41% | +12.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 5.51% | +15.92% |
FSMD vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSMD vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison
FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than BIV's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | 4.21% | 4.01% | 3.79% | 3.09% | 2.41% | 3.42% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 3.01% | 3.02% |
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.18% | 1.32% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSMD and BIV have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSMD has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to BIV (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs BIV's -18.95%.
On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 10.00% vs 0.16% for BIV. On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 10.00% return vs 0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FSMD.
BIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 1.18% for FSMD.
FSMD is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while BIV is Intermediate Core Bond. FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while BIV tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FSMD and 0.03% for BIV.
FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSMD and BIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer