FSMB vs. PUSH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSMB (First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF) and PUSH (PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FSMB returned 4.18% vs 3.85% for PUSH. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSMB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PUSH.

Performance

FSMB vs. PUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF (FSMB) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMB achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly lower than PUSH's 1.32% return.

FSMB

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 1.15%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 4.18%
• 3Y*: 3.56%
• 5Y*: 1.51%
• 10Y*: —

PUSH

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: 3.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMB vs. PUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FSMB First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF	1.15%	4.22%	1.86%
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	1.32%	4.16%	1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMB and PUSH is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024	0.27

The correlation between FSMB and PUSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSMB vs. PUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMB

FSMB Risk / Return Rank: 80
FSMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FSMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FSMB Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FSMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FSMB Martin Ratio Rank: 62

PUSH

PUSH Risk / Return Rank: 88
PUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMB vs. PUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF (FSMB) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSMB	PUSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.99	2.54	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.48	3.84	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.71	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	7.72	-4.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.17	19.17	-8.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSMB vs. PUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMB Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is comparable to the PUSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMB and PUSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSMB	PUSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.99	2.54	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	2.91	-2.16

Drawdowns

FSMB vs. PUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMB drawdown since its inception was -6.32%, which is greater than PUSH's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMB and PUSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSMB	PUSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.32%	-0.85%	-5.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.29%	-0.50%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	0.00%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.16%	-0.11%	-1.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	0.20%	+0.17%

Volatility

FSMB vs. PUSH - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF (FSMB) has a higher volatility of 0.42% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) at 0.30%. This indicates that FSMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSMB	PUSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.42%	0.30%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.02%	0.98%	+0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40%	1.52%	-0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.96%	1.30%	+0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.92%	1.30%	+1.62%

FSMB vs. PUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PUSH's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSMB vs. PUSH - Dividend Comparison

FSMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than PUSH's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FSMB First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF	3.14%	3.09%	2.88%	2.40%	1.47%	1.20%	1.79%	2.27%	0.19%
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	3.23%	3.45%	1.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSMB and PUSH in my portfolio?

FSMB and PUSH have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSMB or PUSH?

FSMB has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to PUSH (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMB dropped -6.32% vs PUSH's -0.85%.

Which ETF is better, FSMB or PUSH?

On 1-year performance, FSMB leads with 4.18% vs 3.85% for PUSH. On fees, PUSH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PUSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSMB or PUSH?

Over the 1-year period, FSMB has performed better with a 4.18% return vs 3.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSMB or PUSH?

PUSH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FSMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSMB or PUSH?

PUSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 3.14% for FSMB.

What is the main difference between FSMB and PUSH?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FSMB and 0.15% for PUSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.