PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMAX vs. VMFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMAX vs. VMFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMAX achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly lower than VMFGX's 18.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSMAX having a 12.17% annualized return and VMFGX not far behind at 11.68%.


FSMAX

1D
1.07%
1M
5.80%
YTD
14.89%
6M
13.61%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
12.17%

VMFGX

1D
0.71%
1M
5.67%
YTD
18.87%
6M
19.12%
1Y
29.92%
3Y*
18.07%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMAX vs. VMFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
14.89%11.40%16.99%25.36%-26.44%12.41%32.28%28.01%-9.44%18.04%
VMFGX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
18.87%7.43%15.86%17.42%-18.99%18.83%22.61%26.20%-10.39%19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMAX and VMFGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.96

The correlation between FSMAX and VMFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMAX vs. VMFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMAX
FSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VMFGX
VMFGX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VMFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMAX vs. VMFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMAXVMFGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.33

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

3.19

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.05

12.69

-1.65

FSMAX vs. VMFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the VMFGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMAX and VMFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMAXVMFGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.87

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.43

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.56

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.64

-0.18

Drawdowns

FSMAX vs. VMFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMAX drawdown since its inception was -50.55%, which is greater than VMFGX's maximum drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMAX and VMFGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMAXVMFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.55%

-39.15%

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.26%

-9.91%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.82%

-25.45%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.31%

-29.25%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.55%

-39.15%

-11.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.17%

-5.71%

-6.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.48%

+0.42%

Volatility

FSMAX vs. VMFGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) is 4.70%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that FSMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMAXVMFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

5.18%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.46%

13.09%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.17%

16.85%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.33%

20.61%

+1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.24%

21.05%

+9.19%

FSMAX vs. VMFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMAX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VMFGX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSMAX vs. VMFGX - Dividend Comparison

FSMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than VMFGX's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
0.50%0.57%0.48%1.17%1.90%7.49%2.14%4.30%6.09%5.44%4.85%6.34%
VMFGX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.59%0.70%0.84%1.21%1.12%0.53%0.79%1.22%1.18%0.93%1.14%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FSMAX and VMFGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VMFGX has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to FSMAX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMAX dropped -50.55% vs VMFGX's -39.15%.

VMFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMAX and VMFGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer