PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMAX vs. FXNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMAX vs. FXNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMAX achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly higher than FXNAX's 0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FSMAX has outperformed FXNAX with an annualized return of 12.22%, while FXNAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.48% annualized return.


FSMAX

1D
2.96%
1M
4.31%
YTD
13.83%
6M
11.67%
1Y
27.30%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
12.22%

FXNAX

1D
0.58%
1M
0.51%
YTD
0.50%
6M
1.01%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
-0.02%
10Y*
1.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMAX vs. FXNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
13.83%11.40%16.99%25.36%-26.44%12.41%32.28%28.01%-9.44%18.04%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
0.50%7.14%1.35%5.82%-13.55%-2.10%7.63%8.50%0.04%3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMAX and FXNAX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011

-0.09

The correlation between FSMAX and FXNAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMAX vs. FXNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMAX
FSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FXNAX
FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMAX vs. FXNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMAXFXNAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

1.69

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.29

4.97

+4.31

FSMAX vs. FXNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the FXNAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMAX and FXNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSMAX vs. FXNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMAX drawdown since its inception was -50.55%, which is greater than FXNAX's maximum drawdown of -19.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMAX and FXNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMAXFXNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.55%

-19.51%

-31.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.26%

-2.94%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.82%

-6.16%

-20.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.31%

-18.54%

-17.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.55%

-19.51%

-31.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-2.79%

+1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-3.86%

-8.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

1.00%

+1.92%

Volatility

FSMAX vs. FXNAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) at 1.41%. This indicates that FSMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMAXFXNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.48%

1.41%

+5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.35%

2.87%

+10.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.80%

3.93%

+13.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.42%

6.08%

+16.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.26%

5.01%

+25.25%

FSMAX vs. FXNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMAX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FXNAX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSMAX vs. FXNAX - Dividend Comparison

FSMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than FXNAX's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
0.50%0.57%0.48%1.17%1.90%7.49%2.14%4.30%6.09%5.44%4.85%6.34%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
3.70%3.58%3.40%3.15%1.81%1.74%2.92%2.68%2.74%2.57%2.76%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMAX and FXNAX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMAX has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to FXNAX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMAX dropped -50.55% vs FXNAX's -19.51%.

FSMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMAX and FXNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer