PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSLZX vs. VMCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSLZX vs. VMCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z (FSLZX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VMCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLZX achieves a 18.79% return, which is significantly higher than VMCPX's 10.55% return.


FSLZX

1D
1.16%
1M
4.63%
YTD
18.79%
6M
18.73%
1Y
31.42%
3Y*
16.88%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*

VMCPX

1D
0.90%
1M
3.68%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.22%
1Y
18.76%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLZX vs. VMCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSLZX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z
18.79%10.58%9.00%17.32%-13.77%23.38%13.20%29.79%-7.45%14.13%
VMCPX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
10.55%11.70%14.68%16.55%-18.68%24.54%18.20%31.06%-9.23%14.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLZX and VMCPX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2017

0.94

The correlation between FSLZX and VMCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSLZX vs. VMCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLZX
FSLZX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FSLZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VMCPX
VMCPX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
VMCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VMCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLZX vs. VMCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z (FSLZX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VMCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSLZXVMCPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

1.62

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

2.31

+0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

2.45

+1.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.21

9.30

+4.92

FSLZX vs. VMCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the VMCPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLZX and VMCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSLZXVMCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.62

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.46

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.63

-0.09

Drawdowns

FSLZX vs. VMCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLZX drawdown since its inception was -43.36%, which is greater than VMCPX's maximum drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLZX and VMCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSLZXVMCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.36%

-39.30%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-8.13%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.28%

-18.93%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.28%

-27.54%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.05%

-5.22%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.13%

+0.19%

Volatility

FSLZX vs. VMCPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z (FSLZX) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VMCPX) at 2.97%. This indicates that FSLZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSLZXVMCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

2.97%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.26%

9.29%

+2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

12.30%

+3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.02%

17.63%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.48%

18.92%

+2.56%

FSLZX vs. VMCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLZX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than VMCPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSLZX vs. VMCPX - Dividend Comparison

FSLZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, more than VMCPX's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLZX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z
6.72%7.99%0.00%0.91%9.89%12.98%2.42%4.32%21.29%4.12%0.00%0.00%
VMCPX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
1.36%1.53%1.50%1.52%1.61%1.13%1.45%1.49%1.84%1.37%1.47%1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FSLZX and VMCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSLZX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to VMCPX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLZX dropped -43.36% vs VMCPX's -39.30%.

FSLZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSLZX and VMCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer