PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSLZX vs. VMCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSLZX vs. VMCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z (FSLZX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLZX achieves a 21.56% return, which is significantly higher than VMCIX's 11.34% return.


FSLZX

1D
0.21%
1M
5.55%
YTD
21.56%
6M
19.35%
1Y
32.83%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*

VMCIX

1D
0.41%
1M
3.04%
YTD
11.34%
6M
10.02%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
12.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLZX vs. VMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSLZX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z
21.56%10.58%9.00%17.32%-13.77%23.38%13.20%29.79%-7.45%14.13%
VMCIX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares
11.34%11.67%14.68%16.54%-18.70%24.53%18.20%31.04%-9.25%14.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLZX and VMCIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017

0.94

The correlation between FSLZX and VMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSLZX vs. VMCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLZX
FSLZX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FSLZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VMCIX
VMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLZX vs. VMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z (FSLZX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSLZXVMCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.27

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

2.44

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.78

9.19

+5.59

FSLZX vs. VMCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the VMCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLZX and VMCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSLZX vs. VMCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLZX drawdown since its inception was -43.36%, smaller than the maximum VMCIX drawdown of -58.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLZX and VMCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSLZXVMCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.36%

-58.86%

+15.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-8.13%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.28%

-18.93%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.28%

-27.54%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.43%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-7.96%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.16%

+0.17%

Volatility

FSLZX vs. VMCIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z (FSLZX) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMCIX) at 4.35%. This indicates that FSLZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSLZXVMCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

4.35%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

9.85%

+2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.56%

12.80%

+3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.07%

17.69%

+2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.47%

18.95%

+2.52%

FSLZX vs. VMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLZX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than VMCIX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSLZX vs. VMCIX - Dividend Comparison

FSLZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than VMCIX's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLZX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z
6.57%7.99%0.00%0.91%9.89%12.98%2.42%4.32%21.29%4.12%0.00%0.00%
VMCIX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.35%1.52%1.49%1.51%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.83%1.36%1.46%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FSLZX and VMCIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSLZX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to VMCIX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLZX dropped -43.36% vs VMCIX's -58.86%.

FSLZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSLZX and VMCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer