FSLTX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FSLTX (Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FSLTX is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 3 years, FSLTX returned 8.75%/yr vs 30.85%/yr for FBGRX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSLTX charges 1.56%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FSLTX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund (FSLTX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLTX achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 16.84% return.

FSLTX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 5.69%
• 6M: 5.71%
• 1Y: 10.27%
• 3Y*: 8.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBGRX

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: 2.83%
• YTD: 16.84%
• 6M: 15.60%
• 1Y: 40.72%
• 3Y*: 30.85%
• 5Y*: 15.32%
• 10Y*: 22.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLTX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FSLTX Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund	5.69%	7.69%	10.10%	1.68%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	16.84%	19.91%	39.77%	37.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLTX and FBGRX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023	0.14

Return for Risk

FSLTX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLTX

FSLTX Risk / Return Rank: 99
FSLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
FSLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FSLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FSLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FSLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLTX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund (FSLTX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSLTX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.58	2.23	+3.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	9.07	2.89	+6.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.63	1.38	+1.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.15	3.31	+8.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	56.37	13.66	+42.71

FSLTX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLTX Sharpe Ratio is 5.58, which is higher than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLTX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSLTX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLTX drawdown since its inception was -3.78%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLTX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSLTX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.78%	-58.64%	+54.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.00%	-12.65%	+11.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.78%	-27.07%	+23.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.08%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.19%	+2.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.59%	-12.51%	+11.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.26%	3.06%	-2.80%

Volatility

FSLTX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund (FSLTX) is 0.45%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that FSLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSLTX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.45%	8.03%	-7.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.55%	14.72%	-13.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18%	18.85%	-16.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.85%	25.09%	-20.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.85%	23.80%	-18.95%

FSLTX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLTX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSLTX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FSLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than FBGRX's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.63%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FSLTX Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund	5.21%	5.50%	7.52%	3.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSLTX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FSLTX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSLTX or FBGRX?

FBGRX has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to FSLTX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLTX dropped -3.78% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.58 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.