FSLSX vs. FMPOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (FMPOX).
FSLSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1983. FMPOX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 13, 2007.
Performance
FSLSX vs. FMPOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSLSX vs. FMPOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund | 6.38% | 0.24% | 9.25% | 20.54% | -7.37% | 33.32% | 8.24% | 34.54% | -16.90% | 17.49% |
FMPOX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 3.52% | 13.02% | 14.48% | 22.51% | -10.62% | 33.96% | 0.95% | 23.61% | -18.93% | 17.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSLSX achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than FMPOX's 3.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSLSX having a 10.46% annualized return and FMPOX not far behind at 9.96%.
FSLSX
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -6.39%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 14.98%
- 3Y*
- 11.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
FMPOX
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 8.20%
- 1Y
- 22.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSLSX vs. FMPOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSLSX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FMPOX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSLSX vs. FMPOX — Risk / Return Rank
FSLSX
FMPOX
FSLSX vs. FMPOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (FMPOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSLSX | FMPOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.66 | 1.06 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 1.60 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.22 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 1.57 | -0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.45 | 6.40 | -2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSLSX | FMPOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 1.06 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.53 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.47 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.38 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSLSX and FMPOX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSLSX vs. FMPOX - Dividend Comparison
FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMPOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.41% | 2.49% | 2.13% | 7.29% | 0.84% | 4.84% | 14.59% | 6.57% | 19.71% | 1.26% |
FMPOX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 7.58% | 8.26% | 10.51% | 1.17% | 13.25% | 1.31% | 2.00% | 1.86% | 14.92% | 8.99% | 1.37% | 5.23% |
Drawdowns
FSLSX vs. FMPOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSLSX drawdown since its inception was -69.87%, which is greater than FMPOX's maximum drawdown of -61.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLSX and FMPOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSLSX | FMPOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.87% | -61.76% | -8.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.25% | -14.75% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.81% | -23.74% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.98% | -45.11% | -2.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.23% | -7.68% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -9.13% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 3.62% | +0.41% |
Volatility
FSLSX vs. FMPOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) is 6.17%, while Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (FMPOX) has a volatility of 6.53%. This indicates that FSLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMPOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSLSX | FMPOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 6.53% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.20% | 12.09% | +3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.98% | 21.62% | +2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.47% | 20.15% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 21.07% | +0.82% |