FSLR vs. IBTL
FSLR (First Solar, Inc.) is a stock, while IBTL (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2031 Maturity US Treasury Index. Over the past 3 years, FSLR returned 10.90%/yr vs 3.19%/yr for IBTL. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FSLR vs. IBTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSLR achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly higher than IBTL's -0.37% return.
FSLR
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 14.54%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 4.91%
- 1Y
- 52.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.90%
- 5Y*
- 27.42%
- 10Y*
- 18.76%
IBTL
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSLR vs. IBTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLR First Solar, Inc. | 2.33% | 48.22% | 2.30% | 15.01% | 71.86% | -7.71% |
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | -0.37% | 7.85% | 0.36% | 3.60% | -15.60% | -1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSLR and IBTL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSLR vs. IBTL — Risk / Return Rank
FSLR
IBTL
FSLR vs. IBTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) and iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSLR | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.16 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 1.16 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.57 | 3.19 | +0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSLR vs. IBTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSLR drawdown since its inception was -96.22%, which is greater than IBTL's maximum drawdown of -20.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLR and IBTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSLR | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.22% | -20.93% | -75.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.10% | -2.83% | -32.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.97% | -7.38% | -52.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.01% | -7.16% | -8.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.20% | -11.43% | -51.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.63% | 1.03% | +15.60% |
Volatility
FSLR vs. IBTL - Volatility Comparison
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) has a higher volatility of 23.37% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) at 1.11%. This indicates that FSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSLR | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.37% | 1.11% | +22.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.98% | 2.41% | +39.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.23% | 3.50% | +54.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.07% | 7.44% | +46.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.84% | 7.44% | +43.40% |
Dividends
FSLR vs. IBTL - Dividend Comparison
FSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLR First Solar, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | 3.97% | 3.93% | 4.07% | 3.04% | 2.36% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSLR and IBTL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSLR has higher volatility (23.37%) compared to IBTL (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLR dropped -96.22% vs IBTL's -20.93%.
FSLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSLR and IBTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer