FSLCX vs. SSLCX
FSLCX (Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund) and SSLCX (DWS Small Cap Core Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FSLCX returned 10.06%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for SSLCX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FSLCX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SSLCX.
Performance
FSLCX vs. SSLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSLCX achieves a 17.46% return, which is significantly higher than SSLCX's 10.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSLCX having a 10.06% annualized return and SSLCX not far ahead at 10.14%.
FSLCX
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- YTD
- 17.46%
- 1Y
- 30.60%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.06%
SSLCX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- 6M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 1Y
- 14.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FSLCX vs. SSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLCX Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund | 17.46% | 14.95% | 9.27% | 19.70% | -22.71% | 20.26% | 13.80% | 29.46% | -11.70% | 13.78% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 10.96% | 4.99% | 9.85% | 13.09% | -13.53% | 41.16% | 14.65% | 21.72% | -14.28% | 11.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSLCX and SSLCX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FSLCX and SSLCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSLCX vs. SSLCX — Risk / Return Rank
FSLCX
SSLCX
FSLCX vs. SSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSLCX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.15 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 1.41 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | 4.16 | +2.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSLCX vs. SSLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSLCX drawdown since its inception was -61.22%, roughly equal to the maximum SSLCX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLCX and SSLCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSLCX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.22% | -63.14% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.51% | -8.78% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.01% | -17.34% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.04% | -22.57% | -7.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.42% | -48.07% | +2.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.68% | -6.08% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -11.25% | +1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 2.99% | +0.78% |
Volatility
FSLCX vs. SSLCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) at 3.81%. This indicates that FSLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSLCX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 3.81% | +2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.77% | 10.83% | +4.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.83% | 15.06% | +4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.24% | 17.18% | +4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 20.97% | +0.32% |
FSLCX vs. SSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSLCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than SSLCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSLCX vs. SSLCX - Dividend Comparison
FSLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.71%, more than SSLCX's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLCX Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund | 13.71% | 14.91% | 1.86% | 0.02% | 7.91% | 22.97% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 26.25% | 8.92% | 3.85% | 10.97% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 1.09% | 1.21% | 1.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 1.67% | 0.35% | 0.16% | 5.99% | 5.78% | 0.60% | 8.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSLCX and SSLCX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSLCX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to SSLCX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLCX dropped -61.22% vs SSLCX's -63.14%.
FSLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSLCX and SSLCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer