PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSLCX vs. RYOTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSLCX vs. RYOTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and Royce Micro Cap Series Fund (RYOTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLCX achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly lower than RYOTX's 37.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLCX has underperformed RYOTX with an annualized return of 10.14%, while RYOTX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.85% annualized return.


FSLCX

1D
1.27%
1M
5.82%
YTD
16.37%
6M
15.55%
1Y
33.11%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
10.14%

RYOTX

1D
1.60%
1M
9.34%
YTD
37.74%
6M
38.47%
1Y
68.90%
3Y*
26.49%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
13.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLCX vs. RYOTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSLCX
Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund
16.37%14.95%9.27%19.70%-22.71%20.26%13.80%29.46%-11.70%13.78%
RYOTX
Royce Micro Cap Series Fund
37.74%13.51%13.24%19.51%-22.66%30.36%24.56%21.19%-9.09%5.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLCX and RYOTX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 1998

0.88

The correlation between FSLCX and RYOTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSLCX vs. RYOTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLCX
FSLCX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FSLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

RYOTX
RYOTX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RYOTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYOTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYOTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
RYOTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYOTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLCX vs. RYOTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and Royce Micro Cap Series Fund (RYOTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSLCXRYOTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.49

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

6.04

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.89

22.08

-12.19

FSLCX vs. RYOTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the RYOTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLCX and RYOTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSLCXRYOTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

3.20

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.49

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.62

-0.21

Drawdowns

FSLCX vs. RYOTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLCX drawdown since its inception was -61.22%, which is greater than RYOTX's maximum drawdown of -56.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLCX and RYOTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSLCXRYOTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.22%

-56.86%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.51%

-12.10%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.01%

-29.83%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.04%

-35.84%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.42%

-44.87%

-0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.82%

-9.43%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

3.31%

+0.23%

Volatility

FSLCX vs. RYOTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and Royce Micro Cap Series Fund (RYOTX) have volatilities of 6.16% and 6.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSLCXRYOTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

6.09%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.79%

16.20%

-2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

22.83%

-4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.97%

23.44%

-2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.23%

23.14%

-1.91%

FSLCX vs. RYOTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than RYOTX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSLCX vs. RYOTX - Dividend Comparison

FSLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.81%, more than RYOTX's 10.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLCX
Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund
12.81%14.91%1.86%0.02%7.91%22.97%0.00%0.31%26.25%8.92%3.85%10.97%
RYOTX
Royce Micro Cap Series Fund
10.85%14.94%12.20%6.97%5.10%23.10%7.40%2.72%13.95%7.76%11.41%12.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSLCX and RYOTX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSLCX has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to RYOTX (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLCX dropped -61.22% vs RYOTX's -56.86%.

RYOTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSLCX and RYOTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer