PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSLCX vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSLCX vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLCX achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLCX has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 10.14%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.


FSLCX

1D
1.27%
1M
5.82%
YTD
16.37%
6M
15.55%
1Y
33.11%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
10.14%

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLCX vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSLCX
Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund
16.37%14.95%9.27%19.70%-22.71%20.26%13.80%29.46%-11.70%13.78%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLCX and IVV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2000

0.84

The correlation between FSLCX and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSLCX vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLCX
FSLCX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FSLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLCX vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSLCXIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.43

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

3.17

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.89

14.71

-4.82

FSLCX vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLCX and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSLCXIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.39

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.83

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.86

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.45

-0.04

Drawdowns

FSLCX vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLCX drawdown since its inception was -61.22%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLCX and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSLCXIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.22%

-55.25%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.51%

-8.89%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.01%

-18.75%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.04%

-24.53%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.42%

-33.90%

-11.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.76%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.82%

-10.78%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

1.91%

+1.63%

Volatility

FSLCX vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that FSLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSLCXIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

2.87%

+3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.79%

8.90%

+4.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

11.80%

+6.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.97%

16.88%

+4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.23%

18.05%

+3.18%

FSLCX vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSLCX vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

FSLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.81%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLCX
Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund
12.81%14.91%1.86%0.02%7.91%22.97%0.00%0.31%26.25%8.92%3.85%10.97%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSLCX and IVV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSLCX has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLCX dropped -61.22% vs IVV's -55.25%.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSLCX and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer