PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSLCX vs. FZROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSLCX vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLCX achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly higher than FZROX's 12.01% return.


FSLCX

1D
1.27%
1M
5.82%
YTD
16.37%
6M
15.55%
1Y
33.11%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
10.14%

FZROX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.79%
YTD
12.01%
6M
11.92%
1Y
29.16%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLCX vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FSLCX
Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund
16.37%14.95%9.27%19.70%-22.71%20.26%13.80%29.46%-17.98%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
12.01%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%31.15%-12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLCX and FZROX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2018

0.87

The correlation between FSLCX and FZROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSLCX vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLCX
FSLCX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FSLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLCX vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSLCXFZROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.45

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

3.39

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.89

15.66

-5.77

FSLCX vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLCX and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSLCXFZROXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.47

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.77

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.73

-0.31

Drawdowns

FSLCX vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLCX drawdown since its inception was -61.22%, which is greater than FZROX's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLCX and FZROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSLCXFZROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.22%

-34.96%

-26.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.51%

-8.89%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.01%

-19.38%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.04%

-25.12%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.82%

-5.51%

-4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

1.92%

+1.62%

Volatility

FSLCX vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) at 2.99%. This indicates that FSLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSLCXFZROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

2.99%

+3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.79%

9.22%

+4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

12.22%

+6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.97%

17.44%

+3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.23%

20.13%

+1.10%

FSLCX vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSLCX vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

FSLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.81%, more than FZROX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLCX
Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund
12.81%14.91%1.86%0.02%7.91%22.97%0.00%0.31%26.25%8.92%3.85%10.97%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.91%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSLCX and FZROX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSLCX has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to FZROX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLCX dropped -61.22% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

FZROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSLCX and FZROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer