FSLBX vs. FSELX
FSLBX (Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio) and FSELX (Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio) are both mutual funds - FSLBX is a Financials Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FSELX is a Semiconductors fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSLBX returned 13.95%/yr vs 39.21%/yr for FSELX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSLBX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for FSELX.
Performance
FSLBX vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSLBX achieves a -13.00% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 85.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLBX has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 13.95%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 39.21% annualized return.
FSLBX
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- -13.00%
- 6M
- -12.12%
- 1Y
- -7.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.95%
FSELX
- 1D
- 6.35%
- 1M
- 26.53%
- YTD
- 85.56%
- 6M
- 83.27%
- 1Y
- 166.37%
- 3Y*
- 68.85%
- 5Y*
- 46.95%
- 10Y*
- 39.21%
FSLBX vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio | -13.00% | 5.78% | 35.74% | 27.77% | -17.54% | 40.61% | 22.66% | 31.60% | -15.37% | 27.74% |
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 85.56% | 52.17% | 49.68% | 78.49% | -35.27% | 59.16% | 44.33% | 64.50% | -12.01% | 34.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSLBX and FSELX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 1985 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSLBX and FSELX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSLBX vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank
FSLBX
FSELX
FSLBX vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSLBX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.71 | -0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 12.18 | -12.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 46.77 | -47.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSLBX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 | 5.35 | -5.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 1.21 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 1.12 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.55 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
FSLBX vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSLBX drawdown since its inception was -68.20%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLBX and FSELX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSLBX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.20% | -82.54% | +14.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.67% | -14.38% | -10.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.06% | -36.31% | +10.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.87% | -46.37% | +15.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | -46.37% | +5.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.80% | 0.00% | -18.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -28.70% | +13.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.60% | 3.74% | +7.86% |
Volatility
FSLBX vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) is 4.11%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 12.01%. This indicates that FSLBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSLBX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 12.01% | -7.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.92% | 25.42% | -8.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.33% | 32.74% | -11.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 38.97% | -16.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 35.07% | -11.43% |
FSLBX vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSLBX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSLBX vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison
FSLBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than FSELX's 8.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 8.83% | 11.11% | 7.97% | 7.20% | 6.69% | 6.99% | 8.13% | 3.36% | 26.80% | 14.44% | 3.82% | 15.22% |
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio | 2.25% | 0.67% | 0.69% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 1.39% | 3.08% | 4.25% | 8.94% | 5.46% | 1.25% | 6.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSLBX and FSELX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSELX has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to FSLBX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLBX dropped -68.20% vs FSELX's -82.54%.
FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.35 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSLBX and FSELX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer