PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSLAX vs. HFCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSLAX vs. HFCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor 529 Small Cap Portfolio Class A (FSLAX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLAX achieves a 18.30% return, which is significantly higher than HFCGX's 16.55% return.


FSLAX

1D
1.03%
1M
2.97%
YTD
18.30%
6M
16.48%
1Y
37.33%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*

HFCGX

1D
1.49%
1M
6.46%
YTD
16.55%
6M
17.79%
1Y
23.40%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
12.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLAX vs. HFCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSLAX
Fidelity Advisor 529 Small Cap Portfolio Class A
18.30%11.61%11.03%18.03%-20.87%31.07%16.96%32.10%-17.11%12.99%
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
16.55%4.78%31.45%19.58%-4.97%29.94%17.73%20.70%-21.39%17.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLAX and HFCGX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between FSLAX and HFCGX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSLAX vs. HFCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLAX
FSLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FSLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCGX
HFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
HFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLAX vs. HFCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor 529 Small Cap Portfolio Class A (FSLAX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSLAXHFCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.78

2.95

+1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.37

9.70

+7.67

FSLAX vs. HFCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the HFCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLAX and HFCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSLAXHFCGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.78

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.56

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.39

+0.10

Drawdowns

FSLAX vs. HFCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLAX drawdown since its inception was -39.85%, smaller than the maximum HFCGX drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLAX and HFCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSLAXHFCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.85%

-62.35%

+22.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-7.82%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.37%

-22.86%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.48%

-26.30%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

0.00%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.71%

-15.23%

+6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

2.37%

+0.14%

Volatility

FSLAX vs. HFCGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor 529 Small Cap Portfolio Class A (FSLAX) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) at 4.56%. This indicates that FSLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSLAXHFCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

4.56%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.47%

9.49%

+3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.02%

12.96%

+5.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.09%

24.08%

-1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.11%

25.82%

-3.71%

Dividends

FSLAX vs. HFCGX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FSLAX nor HFCGX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLAX
Fidelity Advisor 529 Small Cap Portfolio Class A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.11%0.38%3.58%26.58%0.00%0.00%10.47%0.00%0.00%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSLAX and HFCGX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSLAX has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to HFCGX (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLAX dropped -39.85% vs HFCGX's -62.35%.

FSLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSLAX and HFCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer