PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSKY.L vs. SMH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FSKY.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FSKY.L is traded in GBp, while SMH.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSKY.L achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than SMH.L's 95.82% return.


FSKY.L

1D
-2.63%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
-0.84%
6M
-1.73%
1Y
10.75%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
5.00%
10Y*

SMH.L

1D
1.96%
1M
11.22%
YTD
95.82%
6M
96.78%
1Y
167.51%
3Y*
60.11%
5Y*
38.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FSKY.L
First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation
-0.84%1.06%37.83%47.12%-39.21%12.29%4.59%
SMH.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
95.82%38.57%26.28%67.15%-27.87%44.10%2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FSKY.L and SMH.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2020

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between FSKY.L and SMH.L has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSKY.L
SMH.L

Technology

87.5%
100.0%

Communication Services

8.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%

-

Healthcare

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FSKY.L
87.5%
SMH.L
100.0%

Communication Services

FSKY.L
8.6%
SMH.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

FSKY.L
3.5%
SMH.L

-

Healthcare

FSKY.L
0.4%
SMH.L

-

Basic Materials

FSKY.L

-

SMH.L

-

Consumer Defensive

FSKY.L

-

SMH.L

-

Energy

FSKY.L

-

SMH.L

-

Financial Services

FSKY.L

-

SMH.L

-

Industrials

FSKY.L

-

SMH.L

-

Real Estate

FSKY.L

-

SMH.L

-

Utilities

FSKY.L

-

SMH.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSKY.L vs. SMH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSKY.L
FSKY.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FSKY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH.L
SMH.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SMH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FSKY.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSKY.LSMH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.65

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

13.61

-13.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.80

45.15

-44.35

FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSKY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the SMH.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSKY.L and SMH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSKY.L drawdown since its inception was -47.61%, which is greater than SMH.L's maximum drawdown of -36.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSKY.L and SMH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSKY.LSMH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.61%

-36.36%

-11.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.23%

-12.23%

-16.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.05%

-36.36%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.61%

-36.36%

-11.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.55%

-3.80%

-11.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.05%

-9.76%

-6.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.43%

3.69%

+9.74%

Volatility

FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FSKY.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L) have volatilities of 13.36% and 13.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSKY.LSMH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.36%

13.95%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.55%

27.08%

-2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.84%

33.68%

-4.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.23%

31.75%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.37%

31.33%

-0.96%

FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSKY.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FSKY.L nor SMH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FSKY.L and SMH.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMH.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMH.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FSKY.L.

FSKY.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH.L is Semiconductors. FSKY.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while SMH.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FSKY.L and 0.35% for SMH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSKY.L and SMH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer