FSKY.L vs. SMH.L
FSKY.L (First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) and SMH.L (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSKY.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while SMH.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSKY.L returned 5.00%/yr vs 38.70%/yr for SMH.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSKY.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.L.
Performance
FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FSKY.L is traded in GBp, while SMH.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSKY.L achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than SMH.L's 95.82% return.
FSKY.L
- 1D
- -2.63%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- -0.84%
- 6M
- -1.73%
- 1Y
- 10.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 5.00%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH.L
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- 11.22%
- YTD
- 95.82%
- 6M
- 96.78%
- 1Y
- 167.51%
- 3Y*
- 60.11%
- 5Y*
- 38.70%
- 10Y*
- —
FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSKY.L First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | -0.84% | 1.06% | 37.83% | 47.12% | -39.21% | 12.29% | 4.59% |
SMH.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF | 95.82% | 38.57% | 26.28% | 67.15% | -27.87% | 44.10% | 2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSKY.L and SMH.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2020 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSKY.L and SMH.L has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSKY.L
SMH.L
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FSKY.L
SMH.L
Communication Services
FSKY.L
SMH.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
FSKY.L
SMH.L
-
Healthcare
FSKY.L
SMH.L
-
Basic Materials
FSKY.L
-
SMH.L
-
Consumer Defensive
FSKY.L
-
SMH.L
-
Energy
FSKY.L
-
SMH.L
-
Financial Services
FSKY.L
-
SMH.L
-
Industrials
FSKY.L
-
SMH.L
-
Real Estate
FSKY.L
-
SMH.L
-
Utilities
FSKY.L
-
SMH.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSKY.L vs. SMH.L — Risk / Return Rank
FSKY.L
SMH.L
FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FSKY.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSKY.L | SMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.65 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 13.61 | -13.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | 45.15 | -44.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSKY.L drawdown since its inception was -47.61%, which is greater than SMH.L's maximum drawdown of -36.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSKY.L and SMH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSKY.L | SMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.61% | -36.36% | -11.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.23% | -12.23% | -16.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.05% | -36.36% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.61% | -36.36% | -11.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.55% | -3.80% | -11.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.05% | -9.76% | -6.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.43% | 3.69% | +9.74% |
Volatility
FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FSKY.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L) have volatilities of 13.36% and 13.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSKY.L | SMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.36% | 13.95% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.55% | 27.08% | -2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.84% | 33.68% | -4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.23% | 31.75% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.37% | 31.33% | -0.96% |
FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSKY.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSKY.L vs. SMH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FSKY.L nor SMH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FSKY.L and SMH.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMH.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMH.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FSKY.L.
FSKY.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH.L is Semiconductors. FSKY.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while SMH.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FSKY.L and 0.35% for SMH.L.
Find the right allocation for FSKY.L and SMH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer