FSKLX vs. FIGCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund (FSKLX) and Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C (FIGCX).
FSKLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 29, 2015. FIGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 2007.
Performance
FSKLX vs. FIGCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSKLX vs. FIGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSKLX Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund | 3.34% | 21.95% | 1.20% | 13.84% | -13.48% | 9.91% | -1.57% | 16.12% | -4.88% | 21.40% |
FIGCX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C | -6.06% | 16.70% | 4.24% | 19.59% | -24.00% | 14.19% | 15.75% | 32.65% | -12.46% | 28.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSKLX achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly higher than FIGCX's -6.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FSKLX has underperformed FIGCX with an annualized return of 6.05%, while FIGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.27% annualized return.
FSKLX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -7.31%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- 16.96%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- 6.05%
FIGCX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -13.51%
- YTD
- -6.06%
- 6M
- -6.06%
- 1Y
- 7.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSKLX vs. FIGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSKLX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than FIGCX's 2.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSKLX vs. FIGCX — Risk / Return Rank
FSKLX
FIGCX
FSKLX vs. FIGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund (FSKLX) and Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C (FIGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSKLX | FIGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 0.38 | +0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | 0.66 | +1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.09 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 0.42 | +1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | 1.68 | +5.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSKLX | FIGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 0.38 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.20 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.42 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.22 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSKLX and FIGCX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSKLX vs. FIGCX - Dividend Comparison
FSKLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than FIGCX's 3.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSKLX Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.51% | 2.59% | 2.09% | 2.31% | 2.01% | 2.42% | 1.32% | 6.06% | 2.64% | 1.69% | 2.85% | 1.10% |
FIGCX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C | 3.12% | 2.93% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 1.52% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 0.07% |
Drawdowns
FSKLX vs. FIGCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSKLX drawdown since its inception was -27.26%, smaller than the maximum FIGCX drawdown of -56.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSKLX and FIGCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSKLX | FIGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.26% | -56.53% | +29.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -14.03% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.99% | -35.58% | +10.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.26% | -35.58% | +8.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -14.03% | +6.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -11.37% | +6.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 3.54% | -1.11% |
Volatility
FSKLX vs. FIGCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund (FSKLX) is 4.41%, while Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C (FIGCX) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that FSKLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSKLX | FIGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 8.00% | -3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.41% | 12.67% | -5.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 19.00% | -6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.44% | 17.55% | -6.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.89% | 17.53% | -5.64% |