FIGCX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C (FIGCX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FIGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 2007. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
FIGCX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIGCX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGCX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C | -6.06% | 16.70% | 4.24% | 19.59% | -24.00% | 14.19% | 15.75% | 32.65% | -12.46% | 28.23% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIGCX achieves a -6.06% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FIGCX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 7.27%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.
FIGCX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -13.51%
- YTD
- -6.06%
- 6M
- -6.06%
- 1Y
- 7.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.27%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIGCX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIGCX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIGCX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FIGCX
VOO
FIGCX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C (FIGCX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIGCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 0.98 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 1.50 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.23 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 1.53 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | 7.29 | -5.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIGCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 0.98 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.70 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.78 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.83 | -0.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIGCX and VOO is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIGCX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FIGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGCX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C | 3.12% | 2.93% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 1.52% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 0.07% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
FIGCX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIGCX drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGCX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIGCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.53% | -33.99% | -22.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.03% | -11.98% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.58% | -24.52% | -11.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.58% | -33.99% | -1.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.03% | -6.29% | -7.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -3.72% | -7.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 2.52% | +1.02% |
Volatility
FIGCX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C (FIGCX) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that FIGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIGCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | 5.29% | +2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 9.44% | +3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.00% | 18.10% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 16.82% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 17.99% | -0.46% |