PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSKAX vs. FIPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSKAX vs. FIPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSKAX having a 12.08% return and FIPFX slightly higher at 12.41%. Over the past 10 years, FSKAX has outperformed FIPFX with an annualized return of 15.09%, while FIPFX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.90% annualized return.


FSKAX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.80%
YTD
12.08%
6M
11.98%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
15.09%

FIPFX

1D
0.40%
1M
5.52%
YTD
12.41%
6M
13.29%
1Y
28.44%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSKAX vs. FIPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
12.08%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%20.85%
FIPFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class
12.41%21.40%14.15%19.91%-18.22%15.93%16.46%26.02%-7.28%20.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FSKAX and FIPFX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.96

The correlation between FSKAX and FIPFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSKAX vs. FIPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FIPFX
FIPFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FIPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FIPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSKAX vs. FIPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSKAXFIPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.22

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.52

14.21

+1.31

FSKAX vs. FIPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSKAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the FIPFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSKAX and FIPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSKAXFIPFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.50

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.70

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.79

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.72

+0.13

Drawdowns

FSKAX vs. FIPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSKAX drawdown since its inception was -35.01%, which is greater than FIPFX's maximum drawdown of -30.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSKAX and FIPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSKAXFIPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.01%

-30.71%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-8.96%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.43%

-14.71%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

-26.20%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.01%

-30.71%

-4.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-4.21%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.03%

-0.09%

Volatility

FSKAX vs. FIPFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) is 2.97%, while Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that FSKAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSKAXFIPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

3.50%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

9.31%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

11.56%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

14.39%

+3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

15.17%

+3.29%

FSKAX vs. FIPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSKAX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FIPFX's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSKAX vs. FIPFX - Dividend Comparison

FSKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than FIPFX's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIPFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class
1.75%1.97%2.00%1.94%2.02%1.93%1.95%15.16%2.28%2.05%2.09%2.00%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FSKAX and FIPFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIPFX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to FSKAX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSKAX dropped -35.01% vs FIPFX's -30.71%.

FIPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSKAX and FIPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer