PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSIGX vs. HSDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSIGX vs. HSDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) and Hartford Short Duration Fund (HSDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSIGX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than HSDAX's 0.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FSIGX has underperformed HSDAX with an annualized return of 2.40%, while HSDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.59% annualized return.


FSIGX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.33%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
2.40%

HSDAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.92%
6M
1.28%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
2.46%
10Y*
2.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSIGX vs. HSDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSIGX
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund
0.57%7.65%1.79%6.82%-13.30%-0.67%9.71%9.75%-0.15%4.39%
HSDAX
Hartford Short Duration Fund
0.92%6.10%5.03%6.14%-5.04%-0.05%3.80%6.08%0.36%2.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FSIGX and HSDAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2008

0.64

The correlation between FSIGX and HSDAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.79 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSIGX vs. HSDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSIGX
FSIGX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FSIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

HSDAX
HSDAX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HSDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HSDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSIGX vs. HSDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) and Hartford Short Duration Fund (HSDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSIGXHSDAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

2.38

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.08

4.71

-2.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.63

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.48

-1.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.53

15.79

-10.26

FSIGX vs. HSDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the HSDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSIGX and HSDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSIGXHSDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.38

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

1.12

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

1.15

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

1.30

-0.43

Drawdowns

FSIGX vs. HSDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSIGX drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, which is greater than HSDAX's maximum drawdown of -10.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIGX and HSDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSIGXHSDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.22%

-10.19%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-1.32%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-1.32%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

-7.63%

-10.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.22%

-10.19%

-8.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-0.10%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-0.68%

-2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.29%

+0.72%

Volatility

FSIGX vs. HSDAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to Hartford Short Duration Fund (HSDAX) at 0.64%. This indicates that FSIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSIGXHSDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

0.64%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.85%

1.47%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

1.93%

+2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

2.20%

+3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

2.27%

+2.76%

Dividends

FSIGX vs. HSDAX - Dividend Comparison

FSIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than HSDAX's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSIGX
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund
4.28%4.24%4.01%4.00%2.37%1.88%6.32%3.09%3.20%2.86%4.32%3.07%
HSDAX
Hartford Short Duration Fund
4.38%4.26%3.43%2.71%2.03%1.36%2.08%2.60%2.55%2.27%1.74%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSIGX and HSDAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSIGX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to HSDAX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIGX dropped -18.22% vs HSDAX's -10.19%.

HSDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSIGX and HSDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer